CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Chambre 1-11 IDP
66274ef0c1c6ed00087b3c61
22 avril 2024
/00032 - N° Portalis DBVB-V-B7H-BLZ4H [F] [V] [N] C/ LE PROCUREUR GENERAL AGENT JUDICIAIRE DE L'ETAT copie exécutoire délivrée le 22 avril 2024 à Me SCALABRIN
Page 1 sur 2
17e Chambre
615e0df5c25a97f0381f50d2
4 février 2014
2012/003321 du 19/03/2012 accordée par le bureau d'aide juridictionnelle de AIX-EN-PROVENCE), demeurant [Adresse 1] représenté par Me Valentin CESARI, avocat au barreau de NICE, substitué par Me Eric
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1109DEC003096996
9 novembre 1999
The Court must thus ascertain whether, in the instant case, the tenant was treated in such a way that a balance was maintained between the relevant interests (see the Spadea and Scalabrino
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0614DEC004243198
14 juin 2001
22774/93, §§ 46 and 48, ECHR 1999-V, and the Spadea and Scalabrino v. Italy judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A n° 315-B, p. 26, §§ 28 and 31-32).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0111JUD002465094
11 janvier 2001
Par la suite, la Commission a décidé de suspendre l'examen de la requête en attendant que la Cour se prononce dans les affaires Scollo et Spadea et Scalabrino.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0525JUD002085592
25 mai 2000
Le 28 février 1995, la Commission a décidé d’ajourner l’examen de la requête en attendant que la Cour se prononce dans les affaires Scollo et Spadea et Scalabrino c. Italie. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0111JUD002342494
Italie et Spadea et Scalabrino c. Italie, le Gouvernement et le requérant ont présenté leurs observations complémentaires, respectivement les 1 er avril et 31 juillet 1996. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1007DEC002253493
7 octobre 1999
On 13 March 1996, the parties were requested to submit their additional observations following the judgments of the Court in the cases Spadea and Scalabrino v. Italy and Scollo v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1115JUD003112996
15 novembre 2002
They considered that the present case was indistinguishable from the case of Spadea and Scalabrino v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1130JUD001591989
30 novembre 2000
On 28 February 1995, the case was adjourned awaiting the judgments of the Court in the cases Spadea and Scalabrino v. Italy and Scollo v. Italy.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1011DEC004046598
11 octobre 2001
on the applicant’s use of her apartments imposed on her an individual and excessive burden, contrary to the requirements of the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see the Spadea and Scalabrino
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1129DEC005246499
29 novembre 2001
It has therefore to be established, inter alia , that the situation of the alleged victim can be considered similar to that of persons who have been better treated (see the Spadea and Scalabrino v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0201DEC003789597
1 février 2001
14 affords protection against discrimination, that is treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, persons in “relevantly” similar situations (see, e.g., the Spadea and Scalabrino
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0111JUD002146393
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1115JUD003320496
The present case was indistinguishable from the case of Spadea and Scalabrino v. Italy (see the judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1115JUD003239296
The Government pointed out that the present case was indistinguishable from the case of Spadea and Scalabrino v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1115JUD003257796
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0530JUD002253493
30 mai 2000
examine whether the tenant deserved any special protection, i.e. whether the latter’s interests could be considered as prevailing over those of the applicant (see, mutatis mutandis , the Spadea and Scalabrino
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0525DEC003788497
25 mai 1999
decision amounted to an interference with the applicant’s right under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the Court’s task is to supervise its lawfulness, purpose and proportionality (see, e.g., the Spadea and Scalabrino
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1115JUD003122396
The Government maintained that the present case was indistinguishable from the case of Spadea and Scalabrino v.