MINUTE : Admission P.R Assignation du : 29 Juin 2022 JUGEMENT rendu le 19 Décembre 2023 DEMANDERESSE Madame [S] [V] EHPA-USLD [7] [Adresse 1] [Adresse 6] [Localité 3] représentée par Maître Holly

    The applicant was represented by Mr R Jespers, a lawyer practising in Antwerp. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.

The investigator subsequently decided to hold a confrontation between M.H. and the applicant.

The hearings were public unless there were particular reasons to hold them behind closed doors.

  Jespers, a lawyer practising in Antwerp. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

  The Commission considers that the same holds true for the delays which resulted from the adjournment of 8 February 1993.

She was represented by Mr Jesper Storm Thygesen, a lawyer practising in Copenhagen. 3.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY Holds that there has been a violation of Article   3 of the Convention;   Holds that there has been a violation of Article   5 § 4 of the Convention

    Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention taken in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 and dismisses , in consequence, the Government’s preliminary objection; &#

not have to show actual prejudice to the defence due to the non-examination of the knickers, he still has to show the relevance of such an examination to the case against him (see mutatis mutandis Jespers

He was represented by Mr Jesper Lyngby Andersen, a lawyer practising in Aarhus. 3.

The Court is of the view that in the present case the reference to the general unfairness of the proceedings was sufficient to hold that the applicant had complied with the time ‑ limit.

strengthens the impression that the aim was to get a general picture of the squatters movement at Nijmegen rather than investigate specific facts,         - none of the holders

The British rights of the Schoolbook, written by Søren Hansen and Jesper Jensen, two Danish authors, had been purchased by the applicant in September 1970.

    Section   7 (1) contained a list of public functions and professions, the holders of which must make the declaration under Article   6. 23.