nationalité Française [Adresse 3] [Localité 5] Représentant : Me Sylvie MAIO, Postulant, avocat au barreau de VERSAILLES, vestiaire : 163 - N° du dossier 22/916 Ayant pour avocat plaidant Me Smaranda

14pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both }     THIRD SECTION Application no. 36747/08 Mircea PARASCHIV and Smaranda

In the case of Smaranda and Others v.

    The applicants, husband and wife, Mr Mircea Paraschiv (“the first applicant”) and Ms Smaranda Paraschiv (“the second applicant”), are Romanian nationals, who were born respectively in 1954

Russia (no. 30160/04) The applicant, Valeriy Mamedovich Dzhavadov, is a Russian national who was born in 1959 and lives in Belgorod (Russia).

Moreover, when ruling on the unlawfulness of the applicant’s detention, the Constitutional Court’s considerations were distinct from the question whether the finding of a violation constituted sufficient

Secondly, in Smatana the Constitutional Court was able to quash a decision of the ordinary courts that then had the power to release the detainee, whereas in the present case there were no courts with

  Slovakia , cited above, § 69; and, mutatis mutandis , Smatana v. the Czech Republic , no. 18642/04, § 111, 27 September 2007).

    Lastly, the applicant argued that the Regional Court had entirely omitted to give a formal ruling on his offer of a pledge under Article   73 §   1 (b) of the CCP, and that the

Russia , no. 2947/06, § 145, 24   April 2008).

Russia , no.   2947/06, § 145, 24   April 2008).