CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1201DEC003863397
1 décembre 1998
Fribergh, Section Registrar; Having regard to Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; Having regard to the application introduced on 21 &
Page 1 sur 74
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2120904-2251081
20 septembre 2007
deported to Afghanistan; that there would be no violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 (prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens) to the Convention if the applicant were deported.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0315DEC005053099
15 mars 2001
In the first place, they contend that the applicants cannot claim to be victims within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920JUD004522305
The applicant alleged, inter alia , a violation of Article 3 of the Convention and Article 4 of Protocol No. 4 to the Convention, in view of the risks he would run if he were returned to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1121JUD003450397
21 novembre 2006
The relevant articles of the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (Convention No. 98) read as follows: Article 4 “Measures appropriate to national conditions shall
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196302
3 septembre 2019
COMPLAINT The applicants complain that their removal to Italy under the Dublin Regulation will breach Article 3 of the Convention as in all likelihood they will not be provided with adequate reception
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0730JUD001557389
30 juillet 1998
to examine the complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 in conjunction with Article 17 of the Convention (by eleven votes to six); (c) there had been no violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0705JUD000081518
5 juillet 2022
All applicants can thus claim to be victims of the alleged Convention violation. 39.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1976:0206JUD000558972
6 février 1976
Article 11 para. 1 (art. 11-1) of the Convention reads: "Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others, including the right to form and to join trade
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0503DEC006539713
3 mai 2016
Conventions of the International Labour Organisation (“ILO”) 40 . The relevant article of the ILO Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention 1949 (No.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0320DEC005489100
20 mars 2005
With reference to Article 39 of the Code of Commercial Procedure and Article 199 of the Civil Code, it dismissed the applicant's appeal holding that it was not open to the applicant, who was not a party
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0517JUD003973112
17 mai 2018
The provisions of the second to the fourth sentences of the first paragraph of this Article and of Article 209 shall apply correspondingly to the court’s decision relating to seizure.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1109DEC002952995
9 novembre 2000
They finally invoke Article 13 in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention that it is not possible for them to complain about the exclusion of their trade-union from collective bargaining
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0425JUD001557389
25 avril 1996
. 1 (art. 6-1) of the Convention (by sixteen votes to one); (d) there had been a violation of Article 13 (art. 13) of the Convention (by fourteen votes to three).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419DEC003795715
19 avril 2016
Without specifying any Article, the applicant referred to Protocol No. 4 to the Convention, complaining that she had been subjected to collective expulsion by the Soviet authorities, a crime
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0616DEC001867003
16 juin 2005
Villiger , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 17 June 2003, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2021:SO00410
31 mars 2021
En l'espèce, il ressort de l'article 8 de l'accord collectif de la SAS CSF sur la mise en place des CSE d'établissement que le représentant de proximité, désigné par le CSE pour le représenter auprès des
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1005DEC004693499
5 octobre 2000
Having regard to Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the Convention, by which the competence to examine the application was transferred to the Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923JUD006227909
23 septembre 2014
Furthermore, the obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State’s general duty under Article 1 of the Convention to “
ECLI:CEDH:001-109479
3 janvier 2012
Article 8 2. The law of the land shall not be such as to impair, nor shall it be so applied as to impair, the guarantees provided for in this Convention. ...