CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 149 résultats pour « cessation de l'enseignement théorique »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CC

soc

6137223ccd580146773fb540

Cassation

31 mai 1994

31 mai 1994

cour d'appel a violé les articles L. 122-2, L. 122-3-8 et L. 980-2 dans sa rédaction applicable à l'espèce, du Code du travail ; Mais attendu que la cour d'appel a exactement décidé que la seule cessation

Source officielle

Page 1 sur 58

Suivant →
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253c95dbd3db21cbdd88149

Appel

14 février 2006

14 février 2006

dispensée à mademoiselle X..., la société CROC'FRAIS a cessé de rémunérer l'intéressée au-delà du 20 juin 2003, lui établissant à cette date un dernier bulletin de salaire portant la mention : "Rupture

Source officielle
CC

comm

613724d5cd58014677418be2

Cassation

12 décembre 2006

12 décembre 2006

Jennyfer, ce dont il résultait qu'aucune confusion n'était possible dans l'esprit de la clientèle avec les modèles commercialisés sous la griffe "Pimkie" dans les magasins à l'enseigne Pimkie, la cour

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001669413

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2018

4 décembre 2018

After standing there and waiting for some time they decided to cease their participation in the event, but could not leave the venue and remained at the pavement.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1009JUD007619112

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2018

9 octobre 2018

Prior to their arrest the police had given them no warnings and no orders which they could have disobeyed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0609DEC002656207

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2015

9 juin 2015

It also transpires from the hostages’ statements that after these announcements the terrorists refused to allow them to drink or go to the toilet, saying that “there should anyway be no more than 350 of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD001256713

Admin. suprême

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

They should work, learn to respect the laws, learn to meet their obligations, [learn] to pay their taxes and dues. ...” 14 June 2005 edition of the Ataka television programme (on the theme “The Gypsy killers

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0522DEC002857595

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2001

22 mai 2001

cease using the site for the siting of their caravans.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114DEC003345696

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 1998

14 janvier 1998

  They stated that they had been interested in buying the house, but that the South Bohemia Forest State Enterprise had informed them that the purchase price was exorbitant and that there was another

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0529DEC000587472

Admin. suprême

29 mai 1974

29 mai 1974

   The respondent Government, in their written observations on admissibility and at the hearing before the Commission then submitted their reasons why the application should be declared inadmissible

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0413DEC007737016

Admin. suprême

13 avril 2021

13 avril 2021

The two officers then struggled with Mr I.I., trying to handcuff him behind his back. They repeatedly admonished him to cease resistance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13480

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2021

18 novembre 2021

they had been apprised of the decisions placing them in the Centre in a language they could understand.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009DEC004344902

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2007

9 octobre 2007

They submitted that these nuisances adversely affected their privates lives and the normal use of their homes.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0318DEC001829903

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2010

18 mars 2010

In the first days after the events no information was provided about the number of victims, their names and the places where they had been taken.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD005002708

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2014

24 juin 2014

They considered that neither at the time of their arrest, nor subsequently, were there any grounds to suspect them of having committed a specific criminal offence, and that the sole reason for their arrest

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117DEC002927215

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2020

17 novembre 2020

Under these contracts, the applicant company was entitled to use the agricultural lands in the long term and cultivated them on an ongoing basis. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10310

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2014

16 décembre 2014

The statements made at their safety interviews were admitted in evidence against them and they were convicted of conspiracy to murder. The Court of Appeal refused them leave to appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0731JUD000177411

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2014

31 juillet 2014

They had approached the applicant and requested him to stop agitating outside the authorised meeting; they had asked him to return to the place allocated for the meeting and to speak there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2671

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2007

14 juin 2007

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision, considering that publication of the photograph, while Prefect Erignac's close family were still mourning his loss, and given the fact that they had not given their

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622DEC001607705

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2010

22 juin 2010

From their statements it appears that they made two visits, the second one being at about 6 a.m.

Source officielle