Patrick’s Institution and the Board.

   The proceedings before the Forestry Board         The Forestry Board is a public body governed by the 1987 Act on the Central Forestry Boards and Forestry Boards

or via the Internet.

The appeal was dealt with by the Appellate Board of Agricultural Industry (maaseutuelinkeinojen valituslautakunta, landbruksnäringarnas besvärs- nämnd), hereinafter "the Appellate Board".

The case also concerns the lack of any effective remedy with respect to these violations (violation of Art. 13).

       On 14 October 1993 the Appeals Board upheld the Immigration Board's decisions. Thereafter, the applicants moved to a church in Åsele.

On 3 April 1998 the Governor rejected an appeal against the decision of 12 November 1997 lodged by the Social Security Board, considering that the Board was not the party to the proceedings.

On 3 April 1998 the Governor rejected an appeal against the decision of 12 November 1997 lodged by the Social Security Board, considering that the Board was not the party to the proceedings.

On 29 February 1996 the County Administrative Court quashed the Board’s decision, referred the matter back to the Board and directed it to disclose the assessment to the applicant.

  Her appeal to the Appellate Board for Social Insurance ( tarkastuslautakunta, prövningsnämnden ; “the Appellate Board”) was rejected in August 1992 and her further appeal to the Insurance Court

Section 276 Appointment and discharge of supervisory board members by the court “(1) The management board shall submit a proposal for the appointment of a member of the supervisory board to the court immediately

    Following the applicant’s appeal, the Aliens Appeals Board, on 23 April 1997, quashed the Immigration Board’s decision and referred the case back for re-examination.

Upon appeal by the first and second applicants, the decision was upheld by Møre og Romsdal County Social Affairs Board ( Fylkesnemnda for barnevern og sosiale saker – hereafter “the Board”).

    In a decision of the same day, signed by the Board’s chairperson, the Board concluded that it had to rely on the descriptions given by the psychologist at the parent-child institution, who

On 2 May 2003 the Aliens Appeals Board rejected the new application. An application for a residence permit for the third applicant was denied by the Migration Board on 22 July 2003.

By means of a letter of 29 January 2009 the Board informed the applicant company, via the latter’s legal counsel, that the original decision was reconfirmed.

  The Broadcasting Supervisory Board concluded that Mr.

On 10 February 1998 the Insurance Court upheld the Accident Board’s decision, giving the following reasons: “The reasons mentioned in the Accident Board’s decision.

    The Board also reviewed a report prepared by staff at the centre.