CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9050
19 février 1997
Given degree of organisation, limited number of charges selected for prosecution and reduced sentences imposed on appeal, interference not disproportionate.
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:CO10066
31 janvier 2024
[H] [L], prise en qualité de mandataire judiciaire de la société Scopelec, 6°/ au Comité social et économique de la société Setelen, dont le siège est [Adresse 7], 7°/ au Comité social et économique
Chambre sociale 4-5
65b370238c0355000835f8a1
25 janvier 2024
2022 par le Conseil de Prud'hommes Formation paritaire de SAINT GERMAIN EN LAYE N° Section : AD N° RG : 21/00365 Copies exécutoires et certifiées conformes délivrées à : la SELARL LEJARD ZAÏRE SELTENE
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68241-68709
15 février 2000
Italy (no. 1) (38480/97) – over seventeen years and ten months 45 million ITL I.R. v. Italy (No. 39116/98) – over sixteen years and eleven months 40 million ITL Roselli v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205154
14 septembre 2020
COMPLAINT The applicants complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the unreasonable length of the proceedings no. 264/2003, in particular seventeen years for a judgment at first-instance concerning
ECLI:CEDH:001-142790
1 avril 2014
He shares cell no. 419 with other seventeen inmates and they are accommodated in fifteen beds. All the inmates sharing his cell are smokers, whereas he is not smoking.
ECLI:CEDH:001-210110
19 avril 2021
SECTION Application no. 30782/20 Renaldas PAULIUKEVIČIUS against Lithuania lodged on 7 July 2020 communicated on 19 April 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE In 2004 the applicant, who at that time was seventeen
ECLI:CEDH:002-2233
24 avril 2008
proportionality, however, it was noted that the measure had been in force for six years and three months, a period which in itself could constitute a violation and which had continued for approximately seventeen
ECLI:CEDH:001-178049
29 septembre 2017
avoid; page-break-after:avoid }   Communicated on 3 October 2017   FIRST SECTION Application no 70583/17 M.A. against Italy lodged on 28 September 2017 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant is a seventeen
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55800
3 décembre 1999
respect of these failures;   Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Commission on 22 September 1997;   Whereas in its judgment of 28 October 1998 the Court: - held, by seventeen
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1121DEC007367501
21 novembre 2002
Court received the following declaration from the Government: “I declare that, with a view to securing a friendly settlement of the above-mentioned case, the Government of Turkey offer to pay 17,000 (seventeen
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0319DEC000017607
19 mars 2009
Georgiades: We, Mr Christos Georgiades and Mr Agis Georgiades, note that the Government of Cyprus are prepared to pay the sum of 17,000 euros (seventeen thousand euros) to the applicant, G.   M.
ECLI:CEDH:001-140199
19 décembre 2013
They claimed, in particular, that they had been living in a temporary municipal accommodation for seventeen years, had paid charges for it and had taken care of it.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC004924007
29 septembre 2009
THE LAW On 18 June 2009 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant: “I, Paweł Sośnia, note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me the sum of 17,600 (seventeen thousand
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0111DEC001674202
11 janvier 2005
THE LAW On 27 September 2004 the Court received the following declaration signed by the applicant: “I note that the Government of Poland are prepared to pay me the sum of PLN   17,000 (seventeen thousand
ECLI:CEDH:002-6781
28 octobre 1998
Conclusion : no violation (seventeen votes to three). II.
Reconduite à la frontière
DTA_2510937_20250717
17 juillet 2025
Ouillon, magistrat désigné ; - et les observations de Me Seltene, avocate désignée d'office, représentant M.
DTA_2212328_20221026
26 octobre 2022
C ; - et les observations de Me Seltene, avocate désignée d'office, représentant M.
10ème Chambre (JU)
DTA_2115322_20221216
16 décembre 2022
C B, représenté par Me Seltene, demande au tribunal : 1°) de condamner l'État à lui verser la somme de 10 000 euros, à compter du 20 août 2019, à titre de dommages et intérêts, en réparation de son préjudice
ECLI:CEDH:001-176189
12 juillet 2017
In particular, was the examination of his habeas corpus request of 1 September 2014 seventeen days later compatible with that provision (see Sarban v.
Page 10 sur 137
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.