On 26 April 2010 the Court decided to communicate the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the length of the criminal proceedings against him, which began on 12 November

On 17 August 2009 the Court decided to communicate the applicant’s complaint concerning the length of civil proceedings, under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention, which proceedings began in 1991 and

On 29 September 2009 the Court decided to communicate the applicants’ complaint concerning the length of criminal proceedings, which began on 2   April 2001 and ended on 7 July 2008.

(Voir aussi Béláné Nagy c.

The proceedings began in February 1998 and ended on 12 April 2007 (date of service).

Did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant ( Béláné Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 53080/13, §§ 115-118, 13 December 2016)?   3.

The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of criminal proceedings that began on 31 December 1993 and were still pending at the time of the introduction of the application

The proceedings began on 27 April 2001 and ended on 9 May 2007 when the Supreme Court gave its judgment.

On 26 April 2010 the Court decided to communicate the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the length of the criminal proceedings against him, which began on 12 November

The applicant began taking hormone treatment. Despite significant side-effects, she won several distance events at international level in 2011 and 2012.

On 19 May 2010 the Court decided to communicate the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the length of civil proceedings which began on 8 March 1999 and were pending before

The proceedings began in 1997 and ended on 30 January 2007 (date of service).

On 26 April 2010 the Court decided to communicate the applicant’s complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the length of the criminal proceedings against her, which began on 12 November

The proceedings began in 1998 and ended on 18 May 2006 (date of service).

d'appel de Paris, assisté d'Anaïs DECEBAL, greffier lors des débats et de la mise à disposition de la décision APPELANT Monsieur LE PREFET DE POLICE DE [Localité 3] représenté par Me Samuel BENAIS

  Period to be taken into consideration In criminal proceedings “reasonable time” began to run as soon as a person was “charged” within meaning of Article 6 § 1 – recapitulation of Court’s case-law

On 17 August 2009 the Court decided to communicate the applicants’ complaint concerning the length of civil proceedings, under Article   6 § 1 of the Convention, which proceedings began on 13 June

Nicolas BENNANI, Et en qualité de Juge Commissaire suppléant M. Claude CHARMOT.

Nicolas BENNANI, Et en qualité de Juge Commissaire suppléant M. Claude CHARMOT. Nomme la SELARL [Q] [C] en la personne de Me [X] [C] [Adresse 2] En qualité de liquidateur.

Nicolas BENNANI. Nomme la SELARL MJC2A, prise en la personne de Me [O] [M], Mandataire judiciaire [Adresse 3] En qualité de liquidateur.