By letters dated 25 May 2011 sent by registered mail, both the applicant and his representative were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 8 April 2011 and

In a telephone conversation of 15 February 2011 the applicants’ legal representative informed the Registry that the Government’s observations sent to him by facsimile on 4 November 2010 were illegible

By a letter dated 12 June 2009 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s lawyer, who was requested to submit any observations in reply, together with any claims for just satisfaction,

THE LAW By letter dated 13 January 2001 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s representative, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction

On 3 May 2011 the Assize Court ordered the applicant’s release pending the extradition proceedings, as the Turkish authorities were waiting for a photograph and fingerprints of the applicant to be sent

By letter dated 5   November 2014, sent by registered post, the applicants’ representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 17   September

By letter dated 17 December 2015, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of her observations had expired on 15 July 2015 and that no

By letter dated 31   May 2013, sent by registered post to the applicant’s known address, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 12 &#xa0

By letter dated 24 September 2012, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified at his permanent address in Moscow that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 12 June

of the Section agreed exceptionally to extend to 31   October 2011 the time allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations on the admissibility and merits of the above application, and sent

The letter to the applicant was sent to the address of Ms Y. Vandova. The applicant’s representative did not reply to the Registry’s letter.

By a letter dated 28 February 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was requested to inform the Court about the applicant’s whereabouts.

By letter dated 8 November 2012, sent by registered post, the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 2 August 2012 and that no extension of

On 29   August 2013 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant’s home address as specified in the application form. The applicant was again invited to submit his own observations.

By letter dated 14 March 2019, sent by registered post, the applicant was requested to appoint a representative in accordance with Rule 36 § 4   (a) of the Rules of Court.

By a letter dated 9 January 2018, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was requested to inform the Court whether the applicant wishes to further maintain the application.

By letter dated 15 May 2015, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 16 April 2015 and that although no extension of

As no reply was received by the applicant, by a letter dated 1 April 2015, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations

By letter dated 22 March 2010, sent by registered post, the Government's observations were sent to the late applicant's relatives' address.

On 3 December 2019 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant company requesting certain documents essential to the processing of the application. No reply was received to this letter.