The applicant, a private individual, attended the hearings in the trial against O.G. as a visitor in the public gallery.

From the date the prosecutor forwards the case to the trial court, the defendant’s detention is “before the court” (or “pending trial”).

  On 28 November 1986 the trial court's president ordered that the trial be continued on 12, 16, 18, 22 and 29 December.

    During both the pre-trial and trial stages the domestic courts examined at regular intervals (once every six months at most) whether the applicant’s pre-trial detention continued to be justified

within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.

There was a pre-trial hearing in December 1999.

    From the date the prosecutor forwards the case to the trial court, the defendant's detention is “before the court” (or “during the trial”).

    If transferred to Rwanda, [the applicant] will primarily be placed in the Mpanga [Prison] during his pre-trial and detention during trial.

    The applicant challenged the trial judge for bias, which motion was dismissed. At the applicant’s renewed request, the trial judge recused herself.

The trial was postponed until 14 May 2001. 17.     On 10 May 2001 at a preliminary hearing, the applicant sought a further adjournment of the trial.

    During the trial 52.

As follows from the trial judgment and the trial record, the applicant contended at the trial that he had purchased the fuel on or around 15   February 2001 at a petrol station; on 21 February 2001

The trial court’s conclusions regarding the attempted coup 7.

-     In the negative, was there a good reason for the non-attendance of S.A. at the trial? Were the factual or legal grounds of such a reason reflected in the domestic courts’ judgments?

The conviction was founded, to a decisive extent, on the pre-trial statements by the victim and eye-witness.

  ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (C) OF THE CONVENTION The requirements of Article 6 §   3 are to be seen as particular aspects of the right to a fair trial guaranteed by paragraph 1.

On 21 June 2023 the North Holland Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s request to lift or suspend his pre-trial detention.

According to the case file as it stands, the criminal proceedings are pending at first instance while the applicant is still in pre-trial detention.

Turkey - 70337/01 Judgment 20.1.2009 [Section II] Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Pre-trial detention of minor in adult prison: violation   Article 5 Article 5-3 Length of pre-trial