By letter dated 24 November 2011, sent by registered post, the applicant company’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicant company’s observations had expired

By letter dated 8 September 2017, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations had expired on 9 August 2017

On 8 March 2018 the Registry sent a letter to the applicants requesting them to submit by 10 May 2018 written observations and claims for just satisfaction in the above case.

In the absence of any reply, on 21 January 2021 the Court re-sent its letter of 25 May 2020 to the applicant. The applicant did not reply.

By a letter dated 4 August 2010, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 6 July 2010 and that no extension

By letter dated 28 September 2020, sent by registered post to the applicant’s address in Ukraine, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of the requested authority form had expired

November 2023   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the refusal of the prison administrations to hand over to the applicants, who were detained in a prison, various publications sent

THE LAW By letter dated 12 September 2008 the Government's observations were sent to the applicant's representative, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction

On 23   June 2015 copies of three letters by the Registry were sent to the applicant, and the time-limit for submission of his observations was extended until 18 August 2015.

    By a letter dated 19 May 2016 sent to the applicant at the Corradino Correctional Facility, he was again invited to appoint a representative and submit the authority form by 16 June 2016.

On 4 July 2019 the Registry sent a letter to the applicant’s heir requesting certain information essential to the processing of the application. No reply was received to this letter.

A copy was sent to the applicant’s address for any comment. No reply was received.

By letter dated 11 February 2013, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 9 January 2013 and that no extension of time

By letter dated 2 February 2016, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations had expired on 30 March 2015

By letter dated 28 April 2015, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations had expired on 27 March 2015 and

THE LAW By letter dated 4 September 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by

By letter dated 4 November 2009, sent by registered post, the applicant was informed of the Government’s position and both parties were invited to accept the terms of the friendly settlement proposal.

By letter dated 22 April 2016, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 27 January 2016 and that no

    By letter dated 13 May 2014, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representatives were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations had expired on 11 March 2014

On 25   September 2015 a letter was sent to the applicant’s address enquiring whether any heirs or close family members wished to pursue the proceedings in respect of Mr Kalashnikov.