CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

12 110 résultats pour « Favot »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202864

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2020

7 avril 2020

XXVII of 2018 which impeded the execution of the judgment in their favour, as a result of which they considered that they were suffering a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

Source officielle

Page 105 sur 606

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619JUD002454810

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2018

19 juin 2018

The public prosecutor considered as a result that the applicant had disseminated propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation inciting others to violence or other methods of terrorism.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC004245598

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2000

4 mai 2000

P initially opposed this plan but eventually, to avoid a care order, she agreed and, on 1 December 1994, a residence order was made in favour of P’s sister.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202JUD003326402

Admin. suprême

2 février 2006

2 février 2006

Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court finds that by failing for substantial periods of time to comply with the enforceable judgment in the applicant’s favour the domestic authorities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167157

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2016

6 septembre 2016

The majority that voted in favour of the decision included the Judge J.T. (president of the Constitutional Court), and Judge J.Z. Judge C.R., who voted against, wrote an extensive dissenting opinion.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2558412-2780537

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2008

25 novembre 2008

The appeal court had then overruled the first-instance judgment in the husband’s favour and reduced the compensation initially awarded to her.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD001615203

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2011

20 septembre 2011

    The applicant complained about the non-enforcement of the court judgment of 20 January 2004 in his favour.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1209JUD001017818

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2025

9 décembre 2025

’s conviction for committing an offence on behalf of an armed terrorist organisation, the PKK (the Workers’ Party of Kurdistan), without being a member of it and for disseminating propaganda in its favour

Source officielle
CA

1ere Chambre

64bb73350d42fcd969e7ce87

Appel

21 juillet 2023

21 juillet 2023

exécutoire délivrée le : la SELARL JEAN-MICHEL ET SOPHIE DETROYAT la SELARL L.BESSON-MOLLARD la SELARL DENIAU AVOCATS GRENOBLE la SELARL CABINET FERRARO la SELARL CABINET LAURENT FAVET

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0308JUD007587914

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2016

8 mars 2016

    The Court also notes that the final court decision rendered in the applicants’ favour remains unenforced to the present date. 37.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1129JUD003729603

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2005

29 novembre 2005

The court pointed out that the judgments given in the applicant’s favour could not be executed in due time and in full on account of the debtor’s lack of funds, the moratorium on the forced sale of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705JUD003639804

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2007

5 juillet 2007

He alleged that the judgment in his favour had not been enforced in good time because he was of Chechen origin. 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1005DEC001183485

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 1987

5 octobre 1987

decisions that the different judges of the Regional Court of Roermond took in their case and from the evidence used by these judges, the applicants conclude that the judges were biased in the bank's favour

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-585802-589452

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2002

9 juillet 2002

By a judgment of 3 November 1993 the Court of First Instance found in their favour and upheld their right of property, on the ground that the provisions of the decree contravened the Universal Declaration

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1926237-2040113

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2007

1 mars 2007

  On 19 September 2006 the Chamber to which the case had originally been assigned relinquished its jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber under Article 30 [2] of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1450320-1522996

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2005

22 septembre 2005

  The Court noted that the authorities had systematically refused to comply with the decisions given in the applicant’s favour.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC003173796

Admin. suprême

23 février 1999

23 février 1999

s legal counsel and that he had favoured S. by choosing arguments in favour of it. In A.'

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0731JUD001315104

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2008

31 juillet 2008

    The applicant complained about the quashing of the final judgment in her favour by way of supervisory review. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210JUD006543710

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2013

10 décembre 2013

    On 30 May 2007 the Bosilegrad Municipal Court ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered the debtor to pay him: (a)     salary arrears in the total amount of RSD 28,024 [3] ,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1012JUD003518707

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2017

12 octobre 2017

    The applicants complained principally of the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given in their favour and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.

Source officielle