CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202864
7 avril 2020
XXVII of 2018 which impeded the execution of the judgment in their favour, as a result of which they considered that they were suffering a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
Page 105 sur 606
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619JUD002454810
19 juin 2018
The public prosecutor considered as a result that the applicant had disseminated propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation inciting others to violence or other methods of terrorism.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0504DEC004245598
4 mai 2000
P initially opposed this plan but eventually, to avoid a care order, she agreed and, on 1 December 1994, a residence order was made in favour of P’s sister.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0202JUD003326402
2 février 2006
Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court finds that by failing for substantial periods of time to comply with the enforceable judgment in the applicant’s favour the domestic authorities
ECLI:CEDH:001-167157
6 septembre 2016
The majority that voted in favour of the decision included the Judge J.T. (president of the Constitutional Court), and Judge J.Z. Judge C.R., who voted against, wrote an extensive dissenting opinion.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2558412-2780537
25 novembre 2008
The appeal court had then overruled the first-instance judgment in the husband’s favour and reduced the compensation initially awarded to her.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD001615203
20 septembre 2011
The applicant complained about the non-enforcement of the court judgment of 20 January 2004 in his favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1209JUD001017818
9 décembre 2025
’s conviction for committing an offence on behalf of an armed terrorist organisation, the PKK (the Workers’ Party of Kurdistan), without being a member of it and for disseminating propaganda in its favour
1ere Chambre
64bb73350d42fcd969e7ce87
21 juillet 2023
exécutoire délivrée le : la SELARL JEAN-MICHEL ET SOPHIE DETROYAT la SELARL L.BESSON-MOLLARD la SELARL DENIAU AVOCATS GRENOBLE la SELARL CABINET FERRARO la SELARL CABINET LAURENT FAVET
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0308JUD007587914
8 mars 2016
The Court also notes that the final court decision rendered in the applicants’ favour remains unenforced to the present date. 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1129JUD003729603
29 novembre 2005
The court pointed out that the judgments given in the applicant’s favour could not be executed in due time and in full on account of the debtor’s lack of funds, the moratorium on the forced sale of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705JUD003639804
5 juillet 2007
He alleged that the judgment in his favour had not been enforced in good time because he was of Chechen origin. 22.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1005DEC001183485
5 octobre 1987
decisions that the different judges of the Regional Court of Roermond took in their case and from the evidence used by these judges, the applicants conclude that the judges were biased in the bank's favour
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-585802-589452
9 juillet 2002
By a judgment of 3 November 1993 the Court of First Instance found in their favour and upheld their right of property, on the ground that the provisions of the decree contravened the Universal Declaration
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1926237-2040113
1 mars 2007
On 19 September 2006 the Chamber to which the case had originally been assigned relinquished its jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber under Article 30 [2] of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1450320-1522996
22 septembre 2005
The Court noted that the authorities had systematically refused to comply with the decisions given in the applicant’s favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC003173796
23 février 1999
s legal counsel and that he had favoured S. by choosing arguments in favour of it. In A.'
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0731JUD001315104
31 juillet 2008
The applicant complained about the quashing of the final judgment in her favour by way of supervisory review. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210JUD006543710
10 décembre 2013
On 30 May 2007 the Bosilegrad Municipal Court ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered the debtor to pay him: (a) salary arrears in the total amount of RSD 28,024 [3] ,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1012JUD003518707
12 octobre 2017
The applicants complained principally of the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given in their favour and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.