CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD002115302
1 juin 2006
The applicant complained under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention that his complaints about the lawfulness of his pre-trial detention and applications for release pending trial had not been
Page 105 sur 1635
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175532
20 juin 2017
The trial court rejected the motion.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1019JUD004825511
19 octobre 2017
within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0105DEC001488104
5 janvier 2006
On 27 January 2000, the applicant was committed for trial.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1212DEC001237186
12 décembre 1988
made at his trial before the Düsseldorf Court of Appeal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0327JUD005842810
27 mars 2014
(a) Examination of evidence (i) Trial by judge Z. 73. At the trial both the prosecution and the defence submitted their evidence to the court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0630JUD002915111
30 juin 2016
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Access to court;Fair hearing;Adversarial trial);No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1210JUD002107409
10 décembre 2020
, and (iv) the weakness of the corroborating evidence, had rendered the applicant’s trial as a whole unfair (ibid., § 73; see also Megrelishvili v.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-8916
27 mars 1998
April 1998 K.D.B. v. the Netherlands - 21981/93 Judgment 27.3.1998 Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Fair hearing Adversarial trial Plaintiff in civil proceedings in Supreme Court not notified of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1023JUD002142202
23 octobre 2007
The trial before the Helsinki District Court ( käräjäoikeus, tingsrätten ) involved 47 days of hearings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1023JUD002038802
They had not however requested that G. be heard during the pre-trial investigation or in the District Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0606JUD003895807
6 juin 2017
The trial court had duly examined and assessed it.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD000743305
23 juin 2016
those at his trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326JUD005632618
26 mars 2026
The applicant complained principally of unfair trial in the criminal proceedings against him, in particular because of the absence of an opportunity to examine in court witness M. who had
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0327JUD002198193
Interested parties may lodge a written complaint ( schriftelijk zich beklagen ) against such seizure with the trial court before which the case is pending (Article 552a § 1 of the Code of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0624JUD003965415
24 juin 2021
The Government further stated that the only reason the applicant’s co-accused J.O. had been absent from the trial had been the fact that he had died; his statement from the pre-trial stage
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2374524-2559649
30 mai 2008
Turkey (no. 21843/02) The applicant relies on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial within a reasonable time).
ECLI:CEDH:001-112066
22 juin 2012
On 1 December 2004 the applicant was extradited to Ukraine and placed in a pre-trial detention facility.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD005461407
24 juillet 2012
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1207JUD003463517
7 décembre 2021
His pre-trial detention was regularly extended by domestic courts. 3.