On an unspecified date Sh. was admitted to hospital and was unable to attend the trial. 7.     On 28 March 2007 the trial by a jury opened in the Moscow City Court. 8.

In particular, he argued that given the absence of the prosecution witnesses B., C. and D. at the trial, their pre-trial statements should have been interpreted in his favour. 8.

defendants as well as of other property considered as direct proceeds of the crimes on trial and belonging to relatives of the defendants or third parties.

    A complaint by the applicant about his pre-trial detention was dismissed on 1 March 2011 by the Pilsen Regional Court (“the Regional Court”). 5 .

to conduct the trials in camera ). 2.

The trial judge, with the support of both counsel for the prosecution and for the defence, directed the jury to find that the applicant was unfit to plead or stand trial.

  3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of statements obtained allegedly under duress and in the absence of a lawyer to convict her (see Salduz v.

He alleges that a fair trial would have led to his conviction for manslaughter only.

At trial, the police interviews were allowed in evidence.

TRIAL ISOLATION FRANCE [Adresse 20] [Localité 8] S.A.

stage pursuant to Law no. 3842 and the subsequent use by the trial court of those statements taken in the absence of a lawyer (see Salduz v.

In the course of the pre-trial proceedings, the applicant dismissed his defence attorney as he could not afford to pay the fee.

If not, it must be ascertained whether the applicant could have obtained a fresh adversarial trial under domestic law.

an unreasonably short time (that is, before the end of the trial).

In addition, the police officers and the investigating judge who had examined O. and P. at the pre-trial stage had all testified at trial that they had found the witnesses to be credible. 28.

The trial was held in a specially protected court-room which had first been prepared for the Mahler trial.

In doing so, the trial court held as follows: “...

The incident of 26 July 2016 and pre-trial investigation 5 .

any reason at all, although she had been properly summoned by the trial court.