CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0708JUD000927681
8 juillet 1987
As you will no doubt appreciate, our paramount consideration must be the best interests of the children.
Page 11 sur 16
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0322JUD003800304
22 mars 2011
which the parties were not and could not be aware of. 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0524JUD001274487
24 mai 1991
accepted that this submission raises a question of nullity.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1112JUD004728314
12 novembre 2020
The Court concedes that proving such a motive may be difficult in practice.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112346
31 août 2010
Thirdly, any appearance of partiality must be avoided. 40.
6ème Chambre
5fd90dd53bbe5fa738b92fac
25 juin 2020
COUR D'APPEL DE LYON 6ème Chambre ARRET DU 25 JUIN 2020 APPELANTS : Mme [UC] [U] née le [Date naissance 26] 1952 à PAVILLONS-SOUS-[Localité 248] [Adresse 112] [Localité 58] Mme [BE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1124JUD001528789
24 novembre 1994
The Chairman and members of the committee shall be appointed by order of the Minister for Foreign Affairs. ... Decisions shall be taken by a majority. The Chairman shall have a casting vote." 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625JUD000535314
They must therefore be declared admissible. Merits 19 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1123JUD003747711
23 novembre 2021
It must therefore be declared admissible. Merits 48.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114DEC003028096
14 janvier 1998
and as soon as may be either proceedings shall be taken for punishing his offence or he shall be released from arrest.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0620DEC002791202
20 juin 2006
There are twelve Annexes to the Agreement, including the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Annex 4) and the Agreement on Human Rights (Annex 6).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002698595
15 mai 1996
be given blood transfusions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD001262204
4 avril 2013
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Ivakhnenko v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020JUD002910503
20 octobre 2009
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Volkan Özdemir v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1108JUD003080407
8 novembre 2012
’s right to be heard.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1124JUD002183593
24 novembre 1997
The appellants’ assertion that this case-law reverses the burden of proof is incorrect, since cogent evidence must be adduced before it can be accepted that suspicion has been dispelled.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0505JUD001738920
5 mai 2026
It raises issues under Articles 7 and 3 of the Convention. PROCEDURE 2 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1017JUD002990614
17 octobre 2023
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Dimaksyan v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1117JUD003484608
17 novembre 2015
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Dimitrov and Ribov v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0215DEC000822904
15 février 2011
Moreover, they continued to be discriminated against at school and in society.