-Marie Lacour-Rivière, ARRÊT : - réputé contradictoire - prononcé publiquement par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de la Cour, les parties en ayant été préalablement avisées dans les

Rinuy, conseiller rapporteur, Mme Lanoue, conseiller référendaire ayant voix délibérative, et Mme Jouanneau, greffier de chambre, la chambre sociale de la Cour de cassation, composée, en application

    Article 121 § 3 (2) provided at the material time that the court had to return a claim unexamined if it had been lodged by a legally incapable person. 46 .

He was also in need of constant care and supervision, which was difficult to combine with “other work activities” that would “allow for flexible working hours”.

-Marie Lacour-Rivière, ARRÊT : - contradictoire - prononcé publiquement par mise à disposition de l'arrêt au greffe de la cour, les parties en ayant été préalablement avisées dans les conditions

  These operations were achieved by a       combination of duplicity and brutality without parallel in       British history since the Massacre of

In consequence, his claim would not have been successful. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW AND PRACTICE A.     Law no. 127/1997 15.

   On 14 October the applicant submitted further observations on his claim under Article 50 (art. 50) of the Convention. 6.

  Article 46 para. 2 of the Constitution guarantees to everybody who claims to have been denied his or her rights through a decision made by a public authority the right to turn to a court of law

  Article 46 para. 2 of the Constitution guarantees to everybody who claims to have been denied his or her rights through a decision made by a public authority the right to turn to a court of law

    The applicant appealed, reiterating the claims he had made to the Migration Board. 11.

In all three decisions the prosecutor’s office decided not to carry out further investigations, holding that the claims were substantially the same as those which had been previously examined. 17.

Pursuant to the orders made in consequence, the Registrar received on the dates indicated: (a) from the Government, a memorial (15 and 22 June 1992) and observations on the applicant’s claims under Article

d'œuvre auraient dû l'alerter sur le phénomène d'électrolyse et prévoir des mesures pour y remédier ; - l'origine du courant galvanique est, contrairement à ce que soutient la société Michelier, clairement

For this reason, I vote in favour of dismissing the claim for expulsion.” Revocation proceedings under section 50 a of the Aliens Act 32.

It considered that the claims made in relation to the brother did not in any way show that there were threats against him or the applicant.

    Meanwhile, on 18 June 2018 the applicant had brought a civil claim for damages against M.P. and her employer.

According to the Board, the other claims – the fear of terrorists and the forced use of the veil – were also connected to the general situation in Baghdad.

Therefore, the Board held that the applicant’s asylum claims were to be examined on the basis of a return to Somalia.