He complains that he could not participate in those proceedings, eventually leading to the quashing of a final judgment in his favour, which had a direct impact on his civil rights and obligations.

font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right

font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right

Dániel DÖBRENTEY 1989 Hungarian Budapest 9. Dalma DOJCSÁK 1988 Hungarian Budapest 10. Erika FARKAS 1979 Hungarian Göd 11. Tamás FAZEKAS 1978 Hungarian Budapest 12.

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:5.9pt; text-align:justify; font-size:13pt } .s2ED52ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:13pt }     INTERIM RESOLUTION DH (98) 14   HUMAN RIGHTS

Arial } .sCCB68666 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:36pt; text-align:justify } .s47E2B0C6 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     INTERIM resolution DH   (99) 563 HUMAN RIGHTS

{ font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .s2CE7C1B9 { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } INTERIM resolution DH   ( ) 390 HUMAN RIGHTS

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Raffaele Sabato,   Davor Derenčinović, judges, and Attila

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Raffaele Sabato,   Davor Derenčinović, judges, and Attila

Cornelis CASTELIJNS against the Netherlands The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting on 17   May   2016 as a Committee composed of:   Helen Keller, President,  

:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width

:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width

:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 17666/22 Péter KOPÁCSI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 6211/24 Sámuel Tibor KŐRÖS against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

{ font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 725/25 László KABELÁCS against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights