On 18 April 2006 the Diyarbakır Assize Court found the applicant guilty as charged and sentenced him to six years and three months’ imprisonment.

In respect of the legal fees incurred before the Court, the applicants relied on the Istanbul Bar Association’s recommended fee list. 47.     The Government contested the amounts. 48.

    On 27 October 2004 the Istanbul Assize Court found the applicant guilty of the charges and sentenced him to life imprisonment. 16.

It found the applicant guilty of all charges and sentenced him to eight years and four months’ imprisonment. The applicant appealed. 17.

    On 14 November 2005 the Court of Cassation dismissed the appeal in so far as it concerned the trial court’s conclusion concerning the finding of guilt, but quashed it and sent it back to

The first applicant requested 7,000 Turkish liras (TRL) in respect of pecuniary damage and TRL 15,000 in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage.

The civil courts are not bound by either the findings or the verdict of the criminal court of the issue of the defendant’s guilt (Article 53). AS TO THE LAW I.

2025 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Président : Monsieur Hervé BALLEREAU, Président de chambre, Assesseur : Madame Isabelle CHARPENTIER, Conseillère, Assesseur : Monsieur Bruno GUINET

JUILLET 2024 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Président : Madame Nadège BOSSARD, Présidente de chambre, Assesseur : Madame Isabelle CHARPENTIER, Conseillère, Assesseur : Monsieur Bruno GUINET

COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Président : Monsieur Hervé BALLEREAU, Président de chambre, Assesseur : Madame Isabelle CHARPENTIER, Conseillère, Assesseur : Monsieur Bruno GUINET

    The Court considers that, in general, the expression “the state of the evidence” may be a relevant factor for the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt.

Finally, relying on the telephone recordings and the statements of the other accused, the Public Prosecutor proposed that the applicant should be found guilty as charged. 20.

    On 10 May 2006 the Malatya Assize Court found the applicant guilty pursuant to Article 125 of the former Criminal Code and sentenced him to life imprisonment.

Under this law, an accused who confesses his guilt and who assists the security forces in identifying other offenders can be given a lesser sentence.

have been found in his wallet; (ii) the remaining applicants were found guilty of failing to declare any cash they had been carrying when crossing the border on their way out and of failing to obtain

    A list of the applicants is set out in Appendix I. 3.

Ali Gürbüz was convicted and fined 380,000 new Turkish liras (TRY) (approximately 217,000 euros (EUR)). 10.

In a letter dated 8 November 1995, Liga Pro Europa , a human rights association based in Târgu-Mureş, informed the Prefect that six houses had still not been rebuilt, which meant that six families had

While it is true that it is not the Court’s task to address issues of domestic law concerning individual criminal responsibility, or to deliver guilty or not guilty verdicts (see Öneryıldız , cited above