CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

927 résultats pour « Privitello »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1553320-1625764

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2006

11 janvier 2006

The house was taken under state management after the entering into force, on 13 February 1946, of a decree giving the Polish authorities power to assign flats in privately-owned buildings to particular

Page 11 sur 47

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1130DEC003866397

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2000

30 novembre 2000

independence of the legal profession from the State that the conduct of the defence is essentially a matter between the defendant and his counsel, whether counsel be appointed under a legal aid scheme or be privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1117DEC004714114

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2015

17 novembre 2015

The medication the applicant needed could be obtained privately if necessary, within about one week.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172960

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2017

21 mars 2017

and practice The relevant part of Article   46 of the Constitution reads as follows: “The State and public corporations shall be entitled, where the public interest so requires, to expropriate privately

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2305994-2480587

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2008

28 mars 2008

Ukraine (no. 773/03) The applicant is a privately owned commercial company, Regent Engineering International Limited, with its head office in Victoria (the Seychelles) and an office in London.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0215DEC001570389

Admin. suprême

15 février 1990

15 février 1990

          Section 58 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 entitles the accused to consult a solicitor privately at any time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13670

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2022

31 mai 2022

Switzerland (dec.), the present case did not concern merely one of several similar, privately run cultural venues.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193671

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2019

16 mai 2019

Section   4 provided that the coastal zone was the property of the State, but that exceptionally, the land beyond the 6 metre line that was declared coastal zone by the Parliament could be privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0916DEC003501497

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2003

16 septembre 2003

In particular, the defendant was not liable for the enactment of the post-war legislation which had introduced restrictive rules concerning the lease of dwellings in privately-owned houses and the state

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0313JUD006372711

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2014

13 mars 2014

In his presence, the applicant terminated the appointment and stated that he agreed to be questioned without a lawyer, until his wife hired one privately. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD006829401

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2008

6 novembre 2008

After an amendment to the Code of March 2000 insult became privately prosecutable in all cases and was no longer punishable with a term of imprisonment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1116DEC003501497

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2000

16 novembre 2000

In particular, the defendant was not liable for the enactment of the post-war legislation which had introduced restrictive rules concerning the lease of dwellings in privately-owned houses and the state

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708JUD000141103

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2008

8 juillet 2008

    By a judgment of 29   June   1972, considering that the land at issue was part of the public forest estate, the court decided that it could not be privately owned and declared the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0625JUD004642306

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2009

25 juin 2009

declared the applicant’s criminal complaint of 12 June 2000 inadmissible in respect of F.P., Z.T., S.C. and D.E. as, under the relevant domestic law, a prosecution for bodily harm had to be brought privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-119406

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2013

11 avril 2013

The Divisional Court held that the fundamental right of a detained person to consult a legal adviser privately necessitated an enhanced authorisation scheme and that protections afforded by the directed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0109DEC003984698

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2001

9 janvier 2001

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains that he was denied his right to consult a solicitor privately for the first 24 hours of custody during which he was questioned for 7 hours; that following this denial

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-109697

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2012

8 mars 2012

La Cour n’accepte pas l’argument des requérants selon lequel ce nouveau recours serait purement théorique » (décision Société Provitel St ‑ Georges et J.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0503JUD004521307

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2012

3 mai 2012

compatible with effective access to the highest administrative court and which ensured equal treatment for   parties represented by lawyers appointed under the legal ‑ aid scheme   and by privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-126419

Admin. suprême

28 août 2013

28 août 2013

In particular, as allegedly confirmed by an audio recording, a district prosecutor and investigator N. compelled the applicant to decline the services of his privately-retained counsel.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0616DEC005837013

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2020

16 juin 2020

    Nevertheless, the Court observes that the applicant relied upon the results of DNA testing carried out privately to which the child and his mother had not consented (see paragraphs 14 and

Source officielle