CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1553320-1625764
11 janvier 2006
The house was taken under state management after the entering into force, on 13 February 1946, of a decree giving the Polish authorities power to assign flats in privately-owned buildings to particular
Page 11 sur 47
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1130DEC003866397
30 novembre 2000
independence of the legal profession from the State that the conduct of the defence is essentially a matter between the defendant and his counsel, whether counsel be appointed under a legal aid scheme or be privately
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1117DEC004714114
17 novembre 2015
The medication the applicant needed could be obtained privately if necessary, within about one week.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172960
21 mars 2017
and practice The relevant part of Article 46 of the Constitution reads as follows: “The State and public corporations shall be entitled, where the public interest so requires, to expropriate privately
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2305994-2480587
28 mars 2008
Ukraine (no. 773/03) The applicant is a privately owned commercial company, Regent Engineering International Limited, with its head office in Victoria (the Seychelles) and an office in London.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0215DEC001570389
15 février 1990
Section 58 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 entitles the accused to consult a solicitor privately at any time.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13670
31 mai 2022
Switzerland (dec.), the present case did not concern merely one of several similar, privately run cultural venues.
ECLI:CEDH:001-193671
16 mai 2019
Section 4 provided that the coastal zone was the property of the State, but that exceptionally, the land beyond the 6 metre line that was declared coastal zone by the Parliament could be privately
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0916DEC003501497
16 septembre 2003
In particular, the defendant was not liable for the enactment of the post-war legislation which had introduced restrictive rules concerning the lease of dwellings in privately-owned houses and the state
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0313JUD006372711
13 mars 2014
In his presence, the applicant terminated the appointment and stated that he agreed to be questioned without a lawyer, until his wife hired one privately. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD006829401
6 novembre 2008
After an amendment to the Code of March 2000 insult became privately prosecutable in all cases and was no longer punishable with a term of imprisonment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1116DEC003501497
16 novembre 2000
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708JUD000141103
8 juillet 2008
By a judgment of 29 June 1972, considering that the land at issue was part of the public forest estate, the court decided that it could not be privately owned and declared the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0625JUD004642306
25 juin 2009
declared the applicant’s criminal complaint of 12 June 2000 inadmissible in respect of F.P., Z.T., S.C. and D.E. as, under the relevant domestic law, a prosecution for bodily harm had to be brought privately
ECLI:CEDH:001-119406
11 avril 2013
The Divisional Court held that the fundamental right of a detained person to consult a legal adviser privately necessitated an enhanced authorisation scheme and that protections afforded by the directed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0109DEC003984698
9 janvier 2001
COMPLAINTS The applicant complains that he was denied his right to consult a solicitor privately for the first 24 hours of custody during which he was questioned for 7 hours; that following this denial
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-109697
8 mars 2012
La Cour n’accepte pas l’argument des requérants selon lequel ce nouveau recours serait purement théorique » (décision Société Provitel St ‑ Georges et J.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0503JUD004521307
3 mai 2012
compatible with effective access to the highest administrative court and which ensured equal treatment for parties represented by lawyers appointed under the legal ‑ aid scheme and by privately
ECLI:CEDH:001-126419
28 août 2013
In particular, as allegedly confirmed by an audio recording, a district prosecutor and investigator N. compelled the applicant to decline the services of his privately-retained counsel.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0616DEC005837013
16 juin 2020
Nevertheless, the Court observes that the applicant relied upon the results of DNA testing carried out privately to which the child and his mother had not consented (see paragraphs 14 and