The Regional Court found that on one of the occasions the applicant had planned to rob the D.’s house, but had entered another house by mistake, where he had killed one of the inhabitants.

  Mr Kąkol was arrested on suspicion of armed robbery in April 1999 and remanded in custody. His detention was extended several times until his release on 19 October 2005.

At 9.30 a.m. the applicant talked to a police officer and allegedly confessed to those robberies.

After the fight he was arrested and sentenced to eight years' severe imprisonment, apparently for robbery.

Invoquant l’article 10 (liberté d’expression), elle se plaignait d’avoir été contrainte de remettre un CD-ROM susceptible de révéler l’identité de sources journalistiques, lesquelles, sous promesse d’anonymat

s robbery, took charge of the investigation relating to Ms M.V.'s robbery as well.

On 2 December 1992 the Rome Court of Cassation upheld an extradition warrant.

The applicant was accused of having participated in an organised criminal gang, having committed two armed robberies and having been in possession of an illegal firearm.

  The summons to surrender the CD-ROM, the seizure of the CD-ROM and ensuing proceedings 1.   The summons to surrender the CD-ROM and the seizure of the CD-ROM 15.

After committing the first two of these aggravated robberies, he was detained on remand for around forty-five days, and shortly after his release he committed the next two aggravated robberies.

On their way they allegedly beat the applicant up to force him to confess to a robbery.

The applicants were charged in March 1989 with the robbery of 26 January 1989 and a similar robbery in October 1988.

    On 26 September 2008 the Istanbul Assize Court convicted the applicant of membership of an illegal organisation, of two homicides, of one robbery, of two attempted robberies, of the unlawful

On 27   December 2000 the Regional Court, composed of the presiding judge and two lay judges, found the first applicant guilty of having instigated robbery and murder and the second applicant of having

In his statement, allegedly taken under duress in the police station, the applicant confessed that he had not only attempted to rob the shoe-shop but had also committed twenty-four other robberies in various

    Police officers asked the applicant and Mr G. to give explanations ( объяснения ) in relation to the robbery. They denied their participation in the robbery.

The offences arose out of a single robbery which occurred on 23   November 1987 at a shop in Woolwich.

The complainants, Mr M.Ç., Mr N.Ş. and Mr F.B., identified him as the person who had been involved in the respective armed robberies that had taken place in 1993. 8.

    In July 1997 Mr   Assenov was convicted of four street robberies and sentenced to thirty months’ imprisonment.