CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0213JUD000332419
13 février 2024
Accordingly, all the investigative steps should have been carried out again or, if that proved impossible, the previous evidence should have been excluded from the case file.
Page 110 sur 819
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0430JUD001359605
30 avril 2014
In the case of Tikhonova v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0605JUD004604314
5 juin 2015
From March to June 2009 he was cared for in the heliotherapy centre in Berck ‑ sur ‑ Mer, before being moved on 23 June 2009 to the unit in Reims University Hospital providing follow-up
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0211JUD001561310
11 février 2020
case no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0404JUD000386907
4 avril 2017
In the case of Thuo v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0608DEC003872202
8 juin 2004
case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD003227707
29 avril 2014
The Service was reorganised and renamed (it is now called the Sector for the Internal Control of the Police) in November 2005, but this is irrelevant in the present case. 18.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303JUD003337307
3 mars 2020
On 31 March 2016 the investigator issued another decision not to open a criminal case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0526JUD000099919
26 mai 2020
74114/12, §§ 80 and 123, 22 March 2016). The Court does not see any reasons to reach a different conclusion in the present case. 68.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1211JUD003624406
11 décembre 2008
On the former date, the case was set down for trial on 15 March 1999. 14. Between 15 March 1999 and 31 January 2001, a total of 119 hearings were held.
comm
61372423cd58014677412c12
25 février 2004
X..., gérant, a été mis en redressement judiciaire par jugement du 21 janvier 2000, sur le fondement de l'article 182 de la loi du 25 janvier 1985, puis en liquidation judiciaire par jugement du 17 mars
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0905DEC001326502
5 septembre 2006
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties and as they appear from the documents, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110JUD001072707
10 janvier 2017
In the case of Laveykin v.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3954800-4616717
12 juin 2012
Repetitive cases [2] and length-of-proceedings cases, with the Court’s main finding indicated, can be found at the end of the press release.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0304DEC001904891
4 mars 1996
Therefore the expropriation in his case was not covered by the expropriation orders of the Soviet occupational authorities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0314JUD003641606
14 mars 2019
In the case of Kobiashvili v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0119JUD002307911
19 janvier 2021
In the case of Aktiva DOO v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD004909708
17 janvier 2012
In the case of A.A. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0402DEC001958092
2 avril 1993
On or about 15 March 1991 Mrs. T. wrote to Mr. Lee detailing her concern that the children should celebrate Passover. She wrote again on 27 March 1991.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0217DEC000088706
17 février 2015
On 27 March 2002 her comments were rejected and she was informed that she could study the case materials. 15.