44595/15) against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Romanian national, Mr   Constantin

  18851/07, §§   73 and 76, 12   April 2012; Constantin Florea v.   Romania , no.   21534/05, §§ 50 and 52, 19   June 2012; Vella v.

Referring to the Court’s decision in Vasila and Petre Constantin in the name of Mihai Ciobanu   v.

  143/2000 on the fight against drug trafficking and illegal drug use (“Law no. 143/2000”) are described in Constantin and Stoian v.

  Romania , no. 1777/06, § 62, 5 March 2013, and Constantin Aurelian Burlacu v . Romania , no. 51318/12, § 27, 10 June 2014) and Mărgineni Prison (see Iacov Stanciu v .

no. 42447/10) against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Romanian nationals, Mr Constantin

Turkey , no. 17711/07, § 37-40, 12 November 2013, and Constantin and Stoian v.   Romania , nos. 23782/06 and 46629/06, §   64, 29   September 2009).

Court notes that the single act of forgery for which the applicant was convicted was an element intrinsic to the initial charge brought against her of continuous acts of forgery (contrast Adrian Constantin

  Romania , no. 79857/12, 10 June 2014; and Constantin Aurelian Burlacu v . Romania , no. 51318/12, 10 June 2014). 9.

applicant to commit the offence for which he or she was convicted and the domestic courts did not address appropriately the allegations of incitement (see Ramanauskas , cited above, §   73; Constantin

  18851/07, §§   73 and 76, 12 April 2012; and Constantin Florea v.   Romania , no.   21534/05, §§ 50 and 52, 19 June 2012).

Aisa-Anastasia CARP 20/08/1988 Bucharest   Lack of victim status Out of six months Non-exhaustion of domestic remedies Incompatibility ratione temporis     24141/14 21/03/2014 Marius-Constantin

those identified were several police officers: Chief of Police Ioan Moga, his assistant Sergeant Alexandru Şuşcă, Colonel Florentin Nicu Draghici, a certain Panzaru from Luduş, and Lieutenant Colonel Constantin

Commission of Human Rights (“the Commission”) under former Article 25 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Romanian nationals, Mr Constantin

Colombia ; judgment of 21 June 2002, Hilaire, Constantine, Benjamin and Others v. Trinidad and Tobago ).

Referring to the Court’s decision in Vasila and Petre Constantin in the name of Mihai Ciobanu   v.

claimant will be required to put forward an explanation concerning his/her failure to enter an appearance (see, for example, the Supreme Court's judgment of 25 October 2006 in the case of Elenitsa Constantinides

Mme Michel, rapporteure publique, - les observations de Me Paulin, représentant les sociétés SADE-CGTH et GECITEC, de Me Capitani, représentant la communauté d’agglomération du Boulonnais, de Me Constantini