The applicant alleged, in particular, that the invalidation of the parliamentary elections in his electoral constituency had infringed his electoral rights under Article 3 of Protocol No.

  He had maintained at his trial that these statements had been concocted by the police and his defence did not require any witnesses except the interviewing officers.

It concluded that the failure by the applicant’s defence team to deploy relevant evidence in respect of, inter alia , K.T. in his defence resulted in his conviction being unsafe, explaining: “156.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur les pourvois formés par : 1°) Madame Veuve C..., née Z... B...

de son terrain dans son environnement roche avant et a rès-travaux, six hotogra hies de loin, des esquisses d’insertion aysagère et des vues 3D.

    The applicant and his family occupied one room of a flat within a hostel ( общежитие ). 5.

The first applicant said that he had heard from his sister, the third applicant, that their father had been killed and buried under a beech tree in his courtyard. 11.

    On 20 July 2006 the District Court ordered the expert to submit his report by 11 August 2006. 17.     On 2 August 2006 the expert W. submitted his expert opinion.

  The Court notes that the enforcement proceedings started in 1991 when the applicant had sought enforcement of his claim. His claim was partly enforced on 20 June 1991.

No ordinary appeal lay against that decision but the second applicant complained to the Supreme Court about the City Court’s failure to render a decision on his measure.

  Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life ... . 2.

OU BIEN D'INTERDIRE FORMELLEMENT A CES VOYAGEURS DE POURSUIVRE LEUR TENTATIVE, S'IL ETAIT VRAIMENT TROP TARD POUR EUX DE SE HISSER DANS LE 72, OU, AU CAS CONTRAIRE, DE LES AIDER EN CE MOUVEMENT " ;

He also requested, if the appellate court so agreed, that the evidence of a witness on his behalf, namely his employer at the time of the rape, be heard to obtain further details about his duties as the

12.630 R É P U B L I Q U E F R A N Ç A I S E _________________________ AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS _________________________ LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIÈRE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu

D'APPEL DE LIMOGES CHAMBRE SOCIALE ARRÊT DU 24 SEPTEMBRE 2007 À l'audience publique de la chambre sociale de la cour d'appel de LIMOGES, le vingt-quatre septembre deux mille sept a été rendu

The appeal lodged by his lawyer was dismissed on 20 November 1997.

It further dismissed the applicant's complaints about his state of health as unfounded.

In his report, the doctor indicated the presence of hyperaemia on the applicant’s cheeks and another red mark measuring 10 cm x 10 cm on his back.

On 24 December 1993, at about 03.00 hours, he was in his house with his wife <the applicant>, his son Ramazan, his wife Keyvan, their four children and Necla, the wife of his son who was absent doing

    On 24 November 1999 the expert submitted his report concerning the amount of pecuniary damage. 14.