CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0516DEC000239422
16 mai 2023
In all those cases, the competent district court issued two separate assignment orders – one in favour of the first applicant and one in favour of his clients – each awarding the first applicant
Page 113 sur 606
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD007030610
6 juillet 2021
The applicant replied that the quashing of a final judgment in her favour constituted a violation of Article 6 of the Convention. 45.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD005034607
31 mars 2016
The applicant complained about the failure of the regional governor of Sofia region to implement a final judgment in his favour. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019JUD006555001
19 octobre 2006
Koval in the amount of UAH 500,000 to be forfeited in favour of the State.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0730JUD003967803
30 juillet 2015
In the Court’s view, it should have become apparent to him that the debtor company was no longer in a position to honour the relevant judgments in his favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922DEC000568708
22 septembre 2009
1 concerning the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments given in her favour by the Torez Town Court on 21 August and 13 September 2004.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2855
1 février 2007
The applicant did not favour the compromise that was finally reached and had reacted by saying that the teachers were applying intolerable pressure on the pupils that amounted to an abuse of their authority
ECLI:CEDH:002-3839
16 juin 2005
They allege to have continued being frequently subjected to verbal assaults, and that the first applicant, who was involved in work in favour of Roma rights, suffered constant discriminatory practices
ECLI:CEDH:002-4180
26 octobre 2004
[The Chamber proposed to relinquish jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber.] © Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights This summary by the Registry does not bind the Court.
ECLI:CEDH:002-4282
20 juillet 2004
enjoyment of possessions Virtual extinction of guarantor’s claim as a result of court-approved debt adjustment: no violation Facts : The applicant agreed by contract to guarantee a bank loan in favour
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0124DEC004410005
24 janvier 2008
COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement by the State of the final judgment in her favour.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125DEC002313706
25 janvier 2011
He also alleged a violation of Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment given on 28 November 2001 in his favour against
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0619DEC002141404
19 juin 2006
COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-execution of the judgment in her favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0603DEC000105905
3 juin 2010
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the authorities' failure to comply with the final judgment in his favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0329DEC003082908
29 mars 2011
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a final domestic judgment rendered in his favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0524DEC003082808
24 mai 2011
Carić The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention about the prolonged non-enforcement of a final domestic judgment rendered in his favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0126DEC001109607
26 janvier 2010
The applicant complained under Articles 1, 4 § 2, 6 § 1, 13 and 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 that the judgment given in her favour had not been enforced in full.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC004107508
16 octobre 2012
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the non-enforcement of the final judgment delivered in her favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021DEC002469906
21 octobre 2014
1 of the prolonged non-enforcement of the domestic decisions in her favour.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC001373813
6 septembre 2016
The applicant complained under Article 6 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the non-enforcement of a judgment rendered in her favour against a socially-owned