font-size:7pt; vertical-align:super } .s4B8D41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 20014/24 and 20221/24 Violeta MILTENOVIĆ against Serbia and Aleksandra

At the time, that error could not have been known to the parties.

The applicants have not informed the Court of any developments related to the award of compensation after that date. In 2017 they stated that they had not received the compensation due.

    The foregoing considerations are sufficient to enable the Court to conclude that the authorities have not deployed sufficient and convincing efforts to be able to justify such a prolonged

    The new urban development plan and the proceedings to have it set aside 21.

All applicants have been released from prison. THE LAW Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single decision.

Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Applications nos. 14025/17 and 33779/17 Augustin VĂDUVA against Romania and Alexandru

Upon that development of facts, the Administrative Authority should have reconsidered the reasoning and justification for the detention with a view to expulsion and should have released the applicant on

Moreover, owing to the lapse of time since the lodging of the applications, new situations might have arisen: the properties could have been transferred, donated or inherited within the legal system of

page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 29 January 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 4656/19 Carlos Alexandre

et de la détention du tribunal judiciaire de Meaux Nous, Agnès Marquant, présidente de chambre à la cour d'appel de Paris, agissant par délégation du premier président de cette cour, assistée de Alexandre

June 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   George Nicolaou,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 55165/00) against Portugal, lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 20 December 1999 under Article 34 of the Convention by Mr Pedro Alexandre

Lithuania , no. 35601/04, §§ 40-41, 43, 6   July 2010; Alexandre v. Portugal , no. 33197/09, §§ 52, 54-55, 20   November 2012)?

    The Court has recently examined a similar situation and reached the conclusion that the complaint about the inadequate conditions of detention should have been introduced within six months

    All the persons concerned have been released on different dates between July 2014 and November 2015. COMPLAINTS 6.

In their opinion, the decisions under consideration should have been enforced in cash and not in shares.

Moreover, the processing of the citizenship request would have required seven hundred and thirty days.

39019/11 Khosravi Nazir Akhmad Sultan AKHMAD and others against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 16   October 2012 as a Committee composed of:   Linos-Alexandre