During these periods his mother was receiving periodic psychiatric treatment and his father had some difficulty coping with the children on his own.

state of health or his way of life or his behaviour he is endangering his own safety or that of others.

In his own submissions, “his entire activity serves the cause of Hungarians”.

he would be executed himself; subsequently he had no longer acted of his own free will but was a mere "tool" of his superior officers.

Relying on Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention, the applicant claimed that his medical condition did not render him fit for being transferred either by air or land.

On the same day at about 5 p.m. the applicant brought his mother’s personal belongings to the hospital. He was told that his mother was being bathed.

The applicant who is an advocate raised his objections, stating that a wrong kind of ink did not render his passport invalid. He was taken by the police car to the Goragorsk police station.

ECONHOMA [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Me Laurent HIETTER de la SELARL AUXIS AVOCATS, avocat au barreau de LILLE PRONONCE PAR MISE A DISPOSITION : Le 13 mai 2022, l'arrêt a été rendu par mise à

  However, the Commission is of the opinion that in the present case there are no indications that the applicant's treatment in Morocco would render his expulsion contrary to Article 3 (Art. 3) of

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le treize mars mil neuf cent quatre vingt quinze, a rendu l'arrêt suivant

Il ressort des pièces du dossier que la conférence intercommunale des maires des Vallons de la Tour a été réunie le 7 décembre 2015 et la conférence intercommunale des maires de la Vallée de l'Hien le

On 24 May 2004 the applicant, through his counsel, contested these submissions and urgently requested the Court of Appeal to render a decision without a further hearing.

the continuation of his detention on remand.

  The Court suggested that he reduce progressively the strain on his relations with his divorced wife by taking up employment and paying his daughter's alimony; his contacts with his daughter ought

measures on D.’s claim may render complicated or impossible the enforcement of the court’s decision.

It ordered his immediate deportation.

Burkina Faso legally with a regular flight and that he had allegedly lost his passport in the course of his journey.

He further complained that the trial court refused his request to summon the attesting witnesses of his search and his request to question the victim at the hearing rather than use his testimony received

In the applicant's case, his earlier and his new submissions were incoherent.