What is taken into account is the diligence shown by the authorities, any delay attributable to the applicant and any factors causing delay for which the State cannot be held responsible ( Jablonski v.

.; Jablonski   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister   v. Austria , judgment of 27 June 1968, Series   A no.   8, §   4). 47.

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabłoński

  Estonie , n o 55939/00, 15 février 2005, § 64 in fine   ; Jabłoński   c.   Pologne , n o 33492/96, 21 décembre 2000, § 83, et Lelièvre   c.

nationales, lorsqu'elles sont confrontées à la nécessité de prolonger une mesure de détention provisoire, de prendre en considération les mesures alternatives prévues par la législation nationale ( Jabłoński

Poland , no. 30028/06, § 47, 3 November 2009; and Jabłoński   v.   Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000).

Estonia , no. 55939/00, § 64, 15   February 2005, and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21   December 2000).

nationales, lorsqu’elles sont confrontées à la nécessité de prolonger une mesure de détention provisoire, de prendre en considération les mesures alternatives prévues par la législation nationale ( Jabłoński

xa0; §   1   c), les autorités compétentes ont l’obligation de rechercher s’il n’existe pas de mesures alternatives envisageables, pouvant être substituées à la poursuite de la détention ( Jabłoński

  36, § 3; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   83, 21   December 2000). 39.

  36, § 3, and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21   December 2000). 44.

Where such grounds were “relevant” and “sufficient”, the Court must also be satisfied that the national authorities displayed “special diligence” in the conduct of the proceedings (see, for instance, Jabłoński

la nécessité de prolonger une mesure de détention provisoire, les autorités compétentes ont l’obligation de prendre en considération les mesures alternatives prévues par la législation nationale ( Jabłoński

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabłoński

certain lapse of time the persistence of reasonable suspicion does not in itself justify deprivation of liberty and the judicial authorities should give other grounds for continued detention (see Jabłoński

Jablonka, a lawyer practising in Bratislava. 2.     The Government of the Slovak Republic (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms M. Pirošíková. A.

When deciding whether a person should be released or detained, the authorities are obliged to consider alternative measures of ensuring his appearance at trial (see Jablonski v.

  17, §   24; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   102, 21 December 2000; Mõtsnik   v. Estonia , no.   50533/99, §   40, 29 April 2003).

certain lapse of time the persistence of reasonable suspicion does not in itself justify deprivation of liberty and the judicial authorities should give other grounds for continued detention (see Jabłoński