CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531DEC006062913
31 mai 2016
It continued: “Using our common sense, and giving a little and taking a little, ... we can see, in common sense, that the lighting of that bonfire would present a public nuisance to that proportion of
Page 12 sur 182
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2405754-2591243
23 juin 2008
It saw little room for justifying the expulsion of a settled migrant on account of mostly non-violent offences committed when a minor.
1re chambre 2e section
63d0d65481a7b805de12b846
24 janvier 2023
BBR (LITTLE ITALIE) Décision déférée à la cour : Jugement rendu le 15 Février 2022 par le Juge des contentieux de la protection de Versailles N° RG : 21-000982 Expéditions exécutoires Expéditions
9ème - 10ème chambres réunies
CETAT:CETATEXT000034076422
22 février 2017
Il ressort des pièces du dossier soumis aux juges du fond que la société Arthur D Little (ADL) a fait l'objet d'une vérification de comptabilité au titre des exercices clos en 2003 et 2004, à l'issue de
JU 5ème chambre
DTA_2306196_20240422
22 avril 2024
Au cours de l'audience publique ont été entendus : - le rapport de Mme Vaccaro-Planchet, présidente, - et les observations de Me Liztler, représentant la métropole de Lyon.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10596
25 novembre 1994
Legal restrictions on change of name may be justified in public interest - little common ground between domestic systems as to conditions on which change of name may be legally effected - may therefore
ECLI:CEDH:002-9807
27 février 1992
Total duration: from a little less than four years and ten months ( Maciariello ) to thirteen years and ten months ( Vorrasi ). B.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9805
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111606
24 mai 2012
applicant’s action on the ground that the new building had been built according to the plan, that the applicant did not suffer any losses as a result of the building and that she was responsible for having little
ECLI:CEDH:002-9090
15 novembre 1996
Reasonableness of length of proceedings Proceedings in Court of Cassation had lasted a little over three years - length resulted from fact that matter had come before three differently composed
ECLI:CEDH:002-1346
22 septembre 2009
in seven years, they had never resulted in any sanction, either because the act in question was not an offence under domestic legislation or because the authorities considered that the act had very little
ECLI:CEDH:002-3221
13 juillet 2006
The Government’s submissions had shed little light on the developments in the case and had not enabled the Court to establish what happened to the case file and the applicant’s claim.
ECLI:CEDH:002-2042
Little was known about his conduct in prison or the extent to which his living circumstances had stabilised after his release, so the question of his conduct since the commission of the offences carried
ECLI:CEDH:002-9817
ECLI:CEDH:002-9809
ECLI:CEDH:001-248467
15 janvier 2026
Separately, in an email to his ex ‑ partner – which she later disclosed to the barrister – the applicant referred to the latter as, among other things, “an enraged little woman”.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9815
ECLI:CEDH:002-9819
ECLI:CEDH:002-9811
comm
61372229cd580146773fab89
1 février 1994
avenue Montaigne à Paris (8ème), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 13 novembre 1991 par la cour d'appel de Paris (4ème chambre section A), au profit de la société Chezgreen Ltd., dont le siège est 1, Little