CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0914DEC002181109
14 septembre 2010
The said bank was one of a number of privately-owned “pyramid scheme” banks that existed at the time in Serbia, which were well-known for offering extremely high interest rates (in the applicant's
Page 12 sur 47
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1020DEC001835807
20 octobre 2010
Article 5 § 1 (f) in connection with Article 5 § 4 the applicant complained that he was not granted a legal aid lawyer to represent him during the first set of the extradition proceedings and that his privately
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0701DEC001508789
1 juillet 1991
He further states that privately he could not have arranged an extended examination to be carried out, as a privately arranged test would have been costly
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114181
1 octobre 2012
only. ... (2) In respect of criminal offences subject to public prosecution the qualified prosecutor shall be the State Attorney and in respect of criminal offences to be prosecuted privately
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1019DEC004599599
19 octobre 2000
According to Article 78 § 1 of the Code, the accused who does not have a privately hired lawyer to represent him in the proceedings, may require that a counsel be assigned to the case under
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1019DEC000138403
19 octobre 2006
Under the relevant legislation, the holders of specially protected tenancies on privately owned flats were granted the position of protected tenants (“ zaštićeni najmoprimci ”).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0417JUD003416405
17 avril 2012
compatible with effective access to the highest administrative court and which ensured equal treatment for parties represented by lawyers appointed under the legal ‑ aid scheme and by privately
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126DEC003025306
26 novembre 2013
In 1989 the applicant brought an action for compensation against a privately-owned bank, namely the Yapı Kredi Bankası A.Ş., on account of the latter’s default on a contractual obligation
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD004435408
5 septembre 2017
application (no. 44354/08) against Montenegro lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Sinex DOO, a privately
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0427DEC005365307
27 avril 2010
It further summoned the applicant to submit a cassation appeal signed by a privately hired lawyer within a seven-day time ‑ limit. The applicant did not submit a cassation appeal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622DEC000188208
22 juin 2010
On an unspecified later date the Gdańsk Court of Appeal requested the applicant to pay PLN 239,291 by a way of court fees for bringing a cassation appeal which the applicant's privately hired lawyer had
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9577
16 juillet 2014
Given its context, the situation in the present case was unique and different from other cases concerning rehabilitation of an insolvent privately-owned bank.
ECLI:CEDH:001-206551
9 novembre 2020
February 2013, the applicant, not knowing the identity of the persons behind that operation (notably because of confidentiality of banking and telecommunications information which she tried to obtain privately
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1203DEC004714714
3 décembre 2020
The Government submitted that the applicants failed to demonstrate that they had been restricted in some way in privately communicating with their lawyer.
ECLI:CEDH:001-192040
27 février 2019
In 2007 the Council of Ministers (Government) expropriated privately ‑ owned land in the outskirts of Sofia for the construction of a crossroads on the Sofia-Varna motorway.
ECLI:CEDH:001-122346
12 juin 2013
According to Article 14 of the Law on entrepreneurship and enterprises no. 845-XII of 3 January 1992, as worded at the time of events, an individual enterprise was the enterprise privately
ECLI:CEDH:002-720
2 novembre 2010
The Supreme Court rejected his objection to the counsel’s assistance as unreasonable, noting that the applicant had not requested replacement counsel or leave to retain counsel privately.
ECLI:CEDH:001-208382
5 février 2021
They held that the battery was a privately prosecutable offence and that his threats of death were not sufficiently “real” to constitute criminal conduct. 8.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11655
In particular, the Chamber held that the Government’s arguments to justify the difference in treatment between publicly and privately employed retirees were unpersuasive and thus not based on any “objective
Référés civils
680a7febc9134b6bc8ff41eb
8 avril 2025
Monsieur Victor BOULVERT, Juge GREFFIER : Madame Catherine COMBY PARTIES : DEMANDEUR Monsieur [Y] [S] né le 18 Juin 1954 à LYON, demeurant [Adresse 6] représenté par Maître Anne BARLATIER PRIVITELLO