Gurbetelli Ersöz had previously been convicted of involvement with the PKK in or about the end of December 1990 and had been released from prison in 1992. C.

they had committed a criminal offence necessitating pre-trial detention. 6.

It further considered that the newspapers had had a reasonable basis for the published information.

It was stated that the applicant had said: “If they throw me out of the judiciary, I will go to Germany to join the organisation.”

remember whether she had had any support for that information and, if she did, where it had come from. 11 .

They also argued that the measure was disproportionate in that no other European country had similar legislation; that while the Israeli authorities had had a similar administrative policy, this had since

Following this decision HADEP branches had been raided and its administrators had been subjected to physical pressure.

a particular point in time when the land had been designated as building land (see Haider v.

in that judgment had related to the specific facts of that case.

Nor had he shown how he had been discriminated against in his private life as a result of it.

I had only one wish: engaging in a clash and getting in a good shot with my weapon, which I had not used, although I had had it with me for long time.’ ‘...

The first applicant, Elif Çamyar, claimed that she had appointed a new lawyer who had prior engagements, and the second applicant argued that she had encountered problems in meeting with her lawyer due

had been carried out and no one had been brought to justice.

Moreover, the offences had not been limited to a single issue of the newspaper,   but had been continuous.

  It was, in particular, alleged that the wine had still been in fermentation when the original samples had been drawn by the Federal Cellar Inspector, that it had not therefore been suitable for

She submitted that the measure was disproportionate in that no other European country had similar legislation; that while the Israeli authorities had had a similar administrative policy, this had since

[These police officers] gave statements as witnesses and stated that they had learnt from operational sources that a foreigner, named Bolat Haci-Bayram, was secretly living in Kh.'s flat...

the committal proceedings (Zwischenverfahren) and had taken part in the instant proceedings whereas he had allegedly withdrawn earlier), although the Linz Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) had several

decisions had not become final.

The Polish authorities had already had an opportunity to examine the bodies of the victims immediately after they had been repatriated to Poland and before the burials, but they had not done so.