CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

97 129 résultats pour « Thys »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0707JUD002800512

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2015

7 juillet 2015

In the Government’s view by means of this clause, the Commissario balanced the requesting authority’s need to determine criminal liability and the need to restrict the use of such information, thus preventing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930DEC002130213

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2014

30 septembre 2014

The applicants argue that the investigator and the prosecutor were thus not impartial, also because during the investigation they expressed the opinion that no offence had been committed. THE LAW 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0304JUD002591523

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2025

4 mars 2025

They further noted that no invoice or other documentation substantiated the claim for costs before this Court. 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0616DEC003881308

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2009

16 juin 2009

The men had said that they had been sent by the colonel.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122JUD002028710

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2011

22 novembre 2011

Thus, at this stage it was impossible to determine the actual boundaries of the property and in this state of uncertainty it was not surprising that the applicants had not taken up the procedure before

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12809

Admin. suprême

5 mai 2020

5 mai 2020

Thus to invoke this category of argument in response to the applicants’ request had not sought to penalise this entity on account of its opinions or policies.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0315JUD003514106

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2012

15 mars 2012

In view of this, they reported the situation to the social services in Skellefteå.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164096

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2016

27 mai 2016

The parties agreed that they would attempt to find relevant documentation to this effect. Various documentation was subsequently submitted to the court.

Source officielle
CC

civ2

613723cccd5801467740e4fe

Cassation

13 décembre 2001

13 décembre 2001

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société The Contingency insurance company limited, dont le siège est

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-191316

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2019

28 janvier 2019

They used intrigues, violation of human rights, humiliation of human dignity. Why does this happen with impunity, don’t the indicated violations fall under an Article of the Criminal Code?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0214DEC006315100

Admin. suprême

14 février 2004

14 février 2004

Thus, they requested that the parties be heard on the matter and that an inspection of the property be carried out.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10372

Admin. suprême

10 février 2015

10 février 2015

Moreover, respect for the rule of law required the States to secure, on the basis of societal solidarity, a certain income for those whose working capacity fell below the statutory level provided they

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0322DEC003456220

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2022

22 mars 2022

Thus, the 2018 amendments fell outside of the scope of these proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004DEC003227515

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2016

4 octobre 2016

This decision did not take into account the new information submitted about the birth of the twins.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004DEC003323509

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2011

4 octobre 2011

    In addition to this evidence, and the telephone evidence above, the prosecution relied on what it considered to be the improbability of the brothers’ account of travelling so far as they

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10544

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2015

12 mai 2015

arrest and evacuation of some of the applicants, the very victims whom they had been called to protect.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1009DEC007415901

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2003

9 octobre 2003

On 30 November 1999 the Administrative Court ordered the applicants to amend their complaint. On 4 January 2000 they complied with this order.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1107DEC000470105

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2006

7 novembre 2006

Thus, they were ordered to report to the Migration Board three times a week.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005DEC007572501

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2006

5 octobre 2006

In this connection, they stated that the medical examination carried out in the context of the domestic proceedings showed that, although the applicant had a predisposition to the psychological problems

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0201DEC006089900

Admin. suprême

1 février 2005

1 février 2005

The second applicant is the owner and publisher of this newspaper with its seat in Vienna. They are represented before the Court by Mr M. Wukoschitz, a lawyer practising in Vienna.

Source officielle

Page 12 sur 4857

← PrécédentSuivant →