The applicant regularly went to check up on her father and uncle who had remained in their house.

On 4 May 2009 S.L., accusing the applicant of domestic violence, left the house in which she had lived with the applicant and went to a safe house. In so doing she took their daughter with her. 1.

When the children would stay overnight at their father’s house, contact would take place with his mother or sister present.

It is considered that any additional measures to draw attention to that judgment are unnecessary.   6.

It held, inter alia , that there was no obligation in law for a squatter to draw the true owner’s attention to the fact that time was running against him and concluded, as had the High Court, that the

    The applicant’s pre ‑ trial detention and house arrest 29.

s house and related the events to him. 18.

including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - unlawful and disproportionate administrative escorting and arrest on 26/03/2017 (it was possible to draw

The Government further alleged that Tarek Hassan was found on the roof of the house armed with an AK-47 and that other weapons and documents relating to the Ba’ath Party were found in the house. 9.

No habitable houses were left in the village.         Some of the villagers rented houses at Lice, went to the village in the morning and returned in the evening.

On 30   December 2000 the second applicant entered into a lease agreement with Mr U., the owner of the house at 63 Shosseynaya Street, for the renting of one room in the house for commercial purposes

Then he was transferred to another police station, this time under administrative arrest, which pursuant to the Code may not exceed three hours.

    The servicemen ransacked the house.

The first applicant somehow managed to get out of the burning house. Later, the fire was extinguished but the house had been demolished by then.

The applicants further presented a hand-drawn plan of their house indicating the three directions from which the village had been shelled, and photographs of the destroyed house, the minibus and several

The applicant submits that on 8 August 1995 he waited for a visitor in front of a house in which his flat was situated.

inferences and, in circumstances where the trier of fact considers the accused is particularly vulnerable, can draw no inference; and that the trier of fact may only draw such inferences as appear proper

A projectile destroyed the private house killing the applicant’s mother.

CAO fine of RUB 15,000 St Petersburg City Court 13/06/2017 Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest on 29/04/2017 at approximately 2.45 p.m. on 29/04/2017, brought to a police station to draw