CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
soc
61372356cd5801467740874a
12 juillet 1999
FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société Esso Rep, société anonyme, dont le siège est ..., en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 10 mars
Page 124 sur 819
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0504DEC001111404
4 mai 2010
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD000497705
4 avril 2013
In the case of Reznik v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0930JUD005128409
30 septembre 2014
In the case of Anzhelo Georgiev and Others v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0707DEC001255386
7 juillet 1987
penalty is not carried out for the offence in question.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1010JUD001205821
10 octobre 2024
In the case of Eldar Hasanov v.
613722d6cd5801467740217f
18 mars 1997
de l'accord; qu'il s'ensuit que viole ledit accord l'arrêt attaqué qui retient qu'en l'absence de respect par l'employeur des procédures prévues pour la mise en oeuvre de l'accord "aléas de carrière",
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0825DEC000530613
25 août 2015
The circumstances of the case 3. The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1. Background to the case 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0323DEC005356117
23 mars 2021
At a hearing held on 30 September 2013 the trial court read out relevant material evidence from the case file including the report of the customs supervision carried out by the Customs Administration
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0720JUD004126598
20 juillet 2004
On 11 March 2004 the Government submitted a declaration on a friendly settlement of the case signed by the Agent of the Government on 18 February 2004 and by the applicant’s representative on 9 March 2004
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-184374
7 juin 2018
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315DEC004856411
15 mars 2022
They carried the movement’s flags and banners.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1004DEC000445102
4 octobre 2005
On 17 March 1997 the Diyarbakır State Security Court Public Prosecutor declared a lack of jurisdiction and transferred the case to the Diyarbakır Chief Public Prosecutor’s office.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0710JUD002501410
10 juillet 2018
In the case of Erdem v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-167677
23 septembre 2016
On 11 March 2010 the Bratislava V District Court upheld an objection to the enforcement lodged by the GHI, which effectively meant that no enforcement could be carried out against
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1023DEC001356902
23 octobre 2007
On 5 March 2001 the applicants completed UN Human Rights Centre individual reports about cases of forced disappearance.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0702DEC001745990
2 juillet 1991
MARXER Mr. H.C.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1018DEC004799599
18 octobre 2005
It was quashed by the Supreme Administrative Court on 14 March 1991. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC000094805
11 octobre 2011
On 22 March 2004 the City Court quashed the decision of the NEMC of 7 November 2002.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1974:0717DEC000591672
17 juillet 1974
Under cover of a letter dated 22 March 1972 the Commission's Secretary sent the applicants a copy of the Commission's decision of 16 December 1972 on the admissibility of the Kjeldsen case (Application