In the case of Aleksandr Leonidovich Ivanov v.

These injuries could have been caused on 12   March 2004. The bruises on the neck and the rib cage were caused by an impact from solid blunt objects.

in the institutional reform which is at present being carried out in Belgium, as it was in the case of Sequaris, in which the Commission adopted a Report (Sequaris v.

The circumstances of the cases The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

In the case of Yüksel v.

may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court.

    The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.     The applicant’s background 3.

In the case before it, the applicants’ representatives had been unable, despite their efforts, to contact the applicants, who had thus been deprived of the possibility of having further inquiries carried

  In the case of Gorbunov and Gorbachev v.

Following a request by Stögmüller on 15th March 1958, the case was transferred to the Regional Court of Linz and, on 21st April 1958, the Applicant was released on conditions.   4.

The application was finally heard on 3 March 1988 and leave to appeal granted.           The appeal was heard by the Court of Appeal on 7 March 1989.

Reports include any threats [against an event], risk assessments carried out previous to the demonstration and, in some cases, monitoring reports ...

a été prise au niveau de la société mère sans marge de décision de la filiale - les investissements de la filiale sont totalement dépendants de la société mère - le casino de Bandol est entièrement soumis

In the case of Shemilova and Shemilov v.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.

He was released on 7 March 1996 as his expulsion could not be carried out due to his statelessness.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

    The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.

On 19 July 1991, the court struck the case off, ruling that the plaintiff, i.e. the liquidator, failed to pursue his case. This decision was not notified to the liquidator.