lodged on 10 August 2001, Having regard to the declarations submitted by the respondent Government requesting the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases and the applicant's reply thereto

    Complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention in respect of the length of the criminal proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy relating thereto The applicant complained

    In his initial application to the Court of 30 October 2020, the applicant complained, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol   No. 1 thereto, about the delayed

  1 thereto the applicants raise the following complaints against the Russian Federation.

Y... correspondant à la prise en charge de cures thermales à vie au rythme de trois années de suite, suivies de trois années de repos ; qu'en effet, l'expert n'a en rien indiqué que les cures devraient

La SA [J] invoque à cet égard des mails qui lui avaient été adressés par des entreprises tierces, Thiriet et Vinci, et qui ont été transférés à la SAS BTS.

The Court will examine whether: (i) the applicant has suffered a significant disadvantage; (ii) whether respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols attached thereto requires

, comme désignant la ville thermale de SPA et si ce public perçoit le lien entre les eaux minérales et la ville même, ainsi que pour les autres produits visés au dépôt ; qu'en l'espèce, les documents faisant

  7 thereto, concerning the way in which a supervisory review was used in the applicant’s case, to the Croatian Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Ms   Š.

FAITS, PROCEDURE ET PRETENTIONS DES PARTIES Par acte du 22 décembre 2006, reçu par la SCP Carol Domenge, François-Régis Pujol, Denis Thuret, Corinne Alpini, Franco Bucceri, Xavier Caflers, Vincent

It follows that this part of the application is incompatible ratione temporis with the provisions of the Convention and the Protocols thereto within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 and must be rejected pursuant

It follows that this part of the application is incompatible ratione temporis with the provisions of the Convention and the Protocols thereto within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 and must be rejected pursuant

December 2004 Having regard to the declaration submitted by the respondent Government on 27 January 2009 requesting the Court to strike the application out of its list of cases and the applicants’ reply thereto

principle of equality of arms in that, in the proceedings on the private prosecutor's appeal against the costs order, he had not been informed of the appeal and had not been given the possibility to react thereto

Article 37 § 1 in fine includes the proviso that: “However, the Court shall continue the examination of the application if respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto

Article 37 § 1 in fine includes the proviso that: “However, the Court shall continue the examination of the application if respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto

Article 37 § 1 in fine includes the proviso that: “However, the Court shall continue the examination of the application if respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

In the light of the above considerations, the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of