She correctly contends that the report should have led the Home Secretary to make inquiries, most of which, judging by the contents of the reviews, seem never to have been made ...

In those circumstances, it perceives no causal link between the violation found and any non-pecuniary damage which the applicants may have suffered (see Appietto v. France , no.

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 16   October 2012 as a Committee composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Linos-Alexandre

    The Court has to examine whether the applicants have the status of victim within the meaning of Article 34 of the Convention.

    The applicant, Mr Alexandru Ţîmbal, is a Moldovan national, who was born in 1944 and lives in Chişinău, Moldova. 6.

which the winning party would not have any claim to have his or her costs reimbursed....

  (c) Have the people concerned, including the applicants, been provided with information enabling them to assess the risks to which they have been exposed by continuing to live in the proximity of

  Both the Council of Europe’s Commission against Racism and Intolerance (“ECRI”) and the Venice Commission have expressed concern about those amendments to the Electoral Code.

effective remedies for the complaints about the inadequate conditions of their detention, as an action in tort was an effective remedy for grievances similar to those of the applicants, allowing them to have

The brother of the fourth applicant, Mr Alexandru Grama, was shot dead. The demonstrations continued until the fall of the communist regime on 22 December 1989.

  Moreover, new detention facilities have been built at many police stations, including the Athens airport and the police stations of Soufli, Egaleo, Ioannina and Ferres (Evros).

    The applicant, Mr Alexandru Dumbraveanu, is a Moldovan national, who was born in 1968 and lives in Chişinău. 7.     The applicant is a policeman.

Most of them considered that the Constitutional Court should have dismissed the appeal as an actio popularis and should have refrained from expressing any views on the constitutionality of the legislation

The problem ... is to have the hands free and to have information.” De Jorio: “We have some.” Craxi: “What is a newspaper like this doing, scandal and satire, isn't it?”

    In this context, the Court found that for Article 6 in its civil limb to be applicable in the context of criminal proceeding, firstly, an applicant must have a substantive civil right (such

Case Judgment of Final on 33343/96 PANTEA 03/06/2003 03/09/2003 22383/03 L.Z. 03/02/2009 03/05/2009 34022/05 RADU ALEXANDRU MARIUS 21/07/2009 21/10/2009 38511/03 BOROANCĂ 22/06/2010 22/09/2010 36632/04

Russia [GC], 60367/08 and 961/11, 24 January 2017, Information note 203 ; Alexandru Enache v. Romania , 16986/12, 3 October 2017, Information Note 211 ).

The applicant’s late husband, Mr Alexandru Ciobanu, was a taxi driver and died at work, in a car accident on 4 April 2008.

The applicant’s complaint must therefore be examined from the perspective of the objective impartiality test (see, among other authorities, Alexandru Marian Iancu v. Romania , no.