On 9 September 1996 the Aliens Appeals Board (Utlänningsnämnden) upheld the Immigration Board's decision save for the prohibition on return, which was revoked due to the

          The Health Inspectors appealed to the Central Medical Disciplinary Board (Centraal Medisch Tuchtcollege).

lifers to the Parole Board.

This application is still pending before the Appeals Board.

Conclusion : violation (five votes to two).

The Regulations of the Judiciary Qualifications Boards do not enable a judge under review to put questions to invited people or members of the board’s panel dealing with the case ...

The applicants appealed to the Aliens Appeals Board ( Utlännings-nämnden ).

(a) The Board’s review – The Act had introduced a mechanism of automatic subsequent review by the Board for every act of euthanasia performed.

On 2 February 1990 the Salzburg Regional Land Reform Board ( Landesagrarsenat - “the Regional Board”) dismissed the appeal and ordered the Federal Forestry Administration to provide the applicant with

          On 12 March 1990 the Immigration Board refused a fresh request for a residence permit.

VILA AMIGÓ     Mrs   M. HION     Mr   R. NICOLINI       Mrs   M.F.

    In February 2009 a Parole Board Review took place. The Parole Board decided on the papers that the applicant should remain in detention.

    The applicant brought the Board’s decision before the District Court, which, on 21 April 2017, quashed it on grounds of erroneous application of the law and remitted the case to the Board

A permit for such activities was granted to the company by the National Licensing Board for Environment Protection (koncessionsnämnden för miljöskydd, hereinafter "the Licensing Board") on 1 July 1983

  However, it quashed the Provincial Board's decision insofar as the Board had refused to assume jurisdiction concerning the issues of alternative compensation parcels and monetary compensation.

risques naturels prévisibles, l'a condamné à 45 000 euros d'amende et a ordonné, sous astreinte, la remise en état des lieux ; Vu le mémoire produit ; Sur le moyen unique de cassation, pris de la violation

  On 7 July the applicant asked to be assisted by his counsel in the hearing before the Board, scheduled for 10 July.

The Government point out that the applicant signed the motion without adding any conditions (for details see below, decision of the Provincial Land Reform Board [ Landesagrarsenat , “the Provincial Board

On 13 July 1992 the Social Welfare Board heard the parents, who denied the allegations concerning abuse and neglect of the children.   On the same day the Board maintained the care order.