Indeed, the courts had failed to give reasons to support the finding that they had in fact been stolen and that he had been aware of their illegal origin, unlawfully placing on him the burden of proof.

41 Just satisfaction In a judgment of 5 January 2000 the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, as the applicant had had to bear a disproportionate and excessive burden

Did such deprivation or other interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no. 22774/93, §   59, ECHR 1999-V)? 2.

Did such deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on him?

Did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden on him, having particular regard to the severity of the sanction (see, for example, Boljević v. Croatia , no. 43492/11, 31 January 2017)?

If not, did it impose a disproportionate burden on the applicant?    

If the interference complained of was lawful, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see, mutatis mutandis, Immobiliare Saffi v.

  Did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant, taking into account that he could not receive any compensation for his vehicle although he had fully paid the taxes and

In particular, did ordering the payment of those costs of proceedings impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant? (see Cindrić and Bešlić v. Croatia , no. 72152/13, 6 September 2016)?

ayant son siège au 12/ 20 rue Fernand Braudel-75013 PARIS Représentée par Me Bruno MATHIEU de l'Association MATHIEU & ASSOCIE, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : R079 SCP GILLES CEYRAC DE BURHEN

Did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden on the applicant company?

If so, was that interference in accordance with the conditions provided for by law and did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant?

  1, and did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant? (see, mutatis mutandis Di Marco v. Italy , no.   32521/05, §   60, 26   April   2011)?

Does the interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant companies?   2.

If so, was it in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, did it pursue a legitimate aim in the public interest, and did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden on the applicant?

In particular, has an excessive individual burden been imposed on the applicant company taking into account the fact that the compensation the applicant company received appears to be much lower than the

  12055/17 , 23 October 2018) did the applicant suffer an excessive individual burden?

If so, was that interference in the public interest and in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, within the meaning of that Article and did it impose an excessive individual burden on the

the requisite fair balance between the demands of the general interest and the requirements of the protection of the applicant’s right of property, and did it impose a disproportionate and excessive burden