font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right

The Court observes that the applicant did not allege any particular failure to respect his right to a fair hearing on the part of the relevant courts and authorities.

Hungary Károly SZABÓ 1979 Szeged Hungarian Dániel András KARSAI 24/06/2013 35 years, out of which 1 year and 5 months spent in pre-trial detention 500 4. 57459/19 28/10/2019 Német v.

  20363/92 DANIELLI AGAINST ITALY   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 November 1996 at the 576th meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms

font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 26011/16 Mircea STROIA against Romania and 13 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

26049/94, 26050/94, 26051/94, 26052/94, 26053/94, 26054/94, 26055/95 and 26056/94 by Roger Neil GEFFEN, John DRURY, John Samuel MORTLOCK, Alexander Lawrie BEGG, Catherine MULLER, Catherine NI BHEAN, Daniel

{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sB343B0AA { font-family:Arial; font-size:6.67pt; vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 50531/22 Daniel

page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } Communicated on 28 November 2019   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 28982/19 Daniel

:10pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s995BFA6B { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:5pt } INTERIM RESOLUTION DH (97) 509 HUMAN RIGHTS

[N] GESTIONNAIRE IMMOBILIER Syndicat des copropriétaires « MANTEGA-RIGHI », sis [Adresse 10], pris en la personne de son Syndic en exercice, la SARL D.

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Erik Wennerström, President,   Lorraine Schembri Orland,   Ioannis Ktistakis, judges, and

:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width

:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Raffaele Sabato,   Davor Derenčinović, judges, and Attila

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 25731/20 Zsolt HEGEDŰS against Hungary and 4 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 54148/21 Ferencné KAPCSA against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

FRANK against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 12   September 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie

{ font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 18838/24 Dbira FITOURI against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications