CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0608JUD001602690
8 juin 1995
The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number).
Page 13 sur 14
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD002885911
11 décembre 2014
Zahumenský, a lawyer with the human rights organisation Liga lidských práv in Brno, and the second applicant by Mr R. Hořejší, a lawyer practising in Prague.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0827JUD001738920
27 août 2024
The applicant argued that the statements by the prosecution witnesses had been vague and abstract, and pleaded not guilty. 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0722JUD003000903
22 juillet 2008
On 31 October 2003 the Üsküdar Criminal Court acquitted the applicant of the charges of theft, holding that his guilt had not been proven beyond doubt. 24.
Pôle 4 - Chambre 5
6a210bc6cdc6046d4709474b
3 juin 2026
Par lettre recommandée avec demande d'avis de réception du 1er février 2019, Mme [Y] a dénoncé une liste de 34 réserves à la société [Localité 2] [Q].
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0318DEC007527401
18 mars 2004
The court revoked the appointment of the expert and asked the registrar to provide it with a new list of experts.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0407JUD007527401
7 avril 2005
The court revoked the appointment of the expert and asked the registrar to provide it with a new list of experts. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0920JUD004626299
20 septembre 2005
They also contended that the domestic authorities violated their right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002885911
15 novembre 2016
Záhumenský, a lawyer with the human rights organisation Liga lidských práv, and Mr R. Hořejší, a lawyer practising in Prague.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0917JUD007546010
17 septembre 2019
In his opinion, the public prosecutor advised that the court should find the applicant guilty as charged. 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419JUD004125212
19 avril 2016
Should the inmate’s illness be so severe that it falls within the aforementioned list, the commission may recommend to the court to decide on releasing him or her from prison. 50.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0320JUD001653817
20 mars 2018
However, it held that the applicant was to be awarded 2,219.50 Turkish liras (TRY – approximately 500 euros (EUR)) in respect of costs and expenses. 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111JUD007887313
11 janvier 2022
of the extent of their unlawfulness (the seriousness of the insults, the knowledge of their falsehood, the form in which they were produced, the outlet that they had), and because of the established guilt
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0320JUD001323717
Having regard to its findings of violations, the Constitutional Court held that the applicant was to be awarded 20,000 Turkish liras (TRY – approximately 4,500 euros (EUR)) in respect of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0524DEC001720902
24 mai 2005
In 1971 he was placed on the list of jurors and has remained on the list ever since.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0905JUD006736916
5 septembre 2023
The list had included Z.P. and the same suspicions about her had been indicated as above (see paragraph 9 above).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD003386003
9 juillet 2013
The list does not contain the names of the applicants. 3. The police duty logbook 34.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0627JUD002227793
27 juin 2000
He was sentenced to a fine of 35,000 Turkish lira (TRL), which was suspended.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0712JUD004113898
12 juillet 2005
On 16 June 2005, the Court adopted the first judgment striking the case out of the list insofar as it concerned the friendly settlement between the eighteen applicants and the Government.
cr
évrier 2017, qui, dans la procédure suiviec/Mme Nadia X
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:CR00749
7 mai 2018
exemple des plantations au Sierra Leone ; qu'en l'espèce, l'auteur de l'article s'appuie sur deux sources [&ment] mentionnées et mises en ligne dans l'article, d'une part les déclarations, citées entre guillemets