CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 491 résultats pour « Thierry AMOURET »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210JUD004539406

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2013

10 décembre 2013

The applicant supplied, together with his request for enforcement, an expert’s calculation determining the exact amount due. 12.

Page 13 sur 75

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD003948198

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2005

26 juillet 2005

The alleged fact that they had visited a shop or passed by it did not prove that they had committed the serious offences they were convicted of.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005373608

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2014

1 juillet 2014

    In July 2011, following their resumption, the second applicant was paid the full amounts awarded in his favour. D.     As regards the third applicant (Mr Milan Mitić, app.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202DEC001433609

Admin. suprême

2 février 2016

2 février 2016

They maintained that the impugned proceedings were not employment ‑ related and that therefore section 438 of the said Act was not applicable in the applicant’s case. 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330DEC000008706

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2010

30 mars 2010

Under Article 20 of the Criminal Code ( Strafgesetzbuch ) it found that there should be a levy on the enrichment obtained from the crimes in the amount of 5,220.36 euros (EUR).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0527JUD000174221

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2025

27 mai 2025

    There has accordingly been a breach of Article   6 §   1 on that account.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0403DEC003698597

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2001

3 avril 2001

They claim that, also in these respects, there has been a violation of their right to a fair hearing under Article 6 of the Convention. THE LAW 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0611JUD006894610

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2020

11 juin 2020

but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0526JUD000526303

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2005

26 mai 2005

They became legal again when the younger partner reached the age of 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321DEC004169806

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2017

21 mars 2017

    Second and third criteria (lack of original contracts or bankbooks and judicial review) 11 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1103DEC003824403

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2005

3 novembre 2005

The Civil Court could accept that the expropriation was done also in the interests of third parties, but this did not exclude the existence of a public purpose, as there was no doubt that a petrol station

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 5 - Chambre 16

652f7917b053208318995b1f

Appel

17 octobre 2023

17 octobre 2023

of USD 19,197,888 iv) orders HISENSE IMPORT & EXPORT COMPANY LIMITED to pay to [AJ] INDUSTRIAL COMPANY S.A.E. the amount of USD 8,143,020 » ii.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0723JUD000634311

Admin. suprême

23 juillet 2013

23 juillet 2013

According to the applicant, when he asked whether they had a warrant they beat him up, handcuffed him and took him to the police station. At the police station the ill-treatment continued.

Source officielle
TA

7ème Chambre

DTA_2104890_20260212

Administratif

12 février 2026

12 février 2026

Délibéré après l'audience du 22 janvier 2026, à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Béria-Guillaumie, présidente, Mme Gibson-Théry, première conseillère, Mme Baufumé, première conseillère.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0209JUD004393219

Admin. suprême

9 février 2023

9 février 2023

There was accordingly no risk of double collection of the same amount in their individual case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0105JUD001310204

Admin. suprême

5 janvier 2010

5 janvier 2010

  Alternatively, they submitted that the applicant company had, at least in theory, domestic remedies as regards the complaint about the length of the tax dispute, but had failed to exhaust them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305JUD003627408

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2013

5 mars 2013

However, they did not submit the minutes from those hearings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD003223804

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2012

6 novembre 2012

Moreover, further aggravating factors included the high amounts mentioned in the documents and the fact that they had been linked with the professional capacities of the individuals mentioned in them.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130JUD004720306

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2010

30 novembre 2010

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, among other authorities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD003803302

Admin. suprême

13 juillet 2006

13 juillet 2006

They contested the amount to be paid and alleged that the street had not been duly constructed.

Source officielle