CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210JUD004539406
10 décembre 2013
The applicant supplied, together with his request for enforcement, an expert’s calculation determining the exact amount due. 12.
Page 13 sur 75
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD003948198
26 juillet 2005
The alleged fact that they had visited a shop or passed by it did not prove that they had committed the serious offences they were convicted of.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005373608
1 juillet 2014
In July 2011, following their resumption, the second applicant was paid the full amounts awarded in his favour. D. As regards the third applicant (Mr Milan Mitić, app.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0202DEC001433609
2 février 2016
They maintained that the impugned proceedings were not employment ‑ related and that therefore section 438 of the said Act was not applicable in the applicant’s case. 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0330DEC000008706
30 mars 2010
Under Article 20 of the Criminal Code ( Strafgesetzbuch ) it found that there should be a levy on the enrichment obtained from the crimes in the amount of 5,220.36 euros (EUR).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0527JUD000174221
27 mai 2025
There has accordingly been a breach of Article 6 § 1 on that account.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0403DEC003698597
3 avril 2001
They claim that, also in these respects, there has been a violation of their right to a fair hearing under Article 6 of the Convention. THE LAW 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0611JUD006894610
11 juin 2020
but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0526JUD000526303
26 mai 2005
They became legal again when the younger partner reached the age of 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321DEC004169806
21 mars 2017
Second and third criteria (lack of original contracts or bankbooks and judicial review) 11 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1103DEC003824403
3 novembre 2005
The Civil Court could accept that the expropriation was done also in the interests of third parties, but this did not exclude the existence of a public purpose, as there was no doubt that a petrol station
Pôle 5 - Chambre 16
652f7917b053208318995b1f
17 octobre 2023
of USD 19,197,888 iv) orders HISENSE IMPORT & EXPORT COMPANY LIMITED to pay to [AJ] INDUSTRIAL COMPANY S.A.E. the amount of USD 8,143,020 » ii.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0723JUD000634311
23 juillet 2013
According to the applicant, when he asked whether they had a warrant they beat him up, handcuffed him and took him to the police station. At the police station the ill-treatment continued.
7ème Chambre
DTA_2104890_20260212
12 février 2026
Délibéré après l'audience du 22 janvier 2026, à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Béria-Guillaumie, présidente, Mme Gibson-Théry, première conseillère, Mme Baufumé, première conseillère.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0209JUD004393219
9 février 2023
There was accordingly no risk of double collection of the same amount in their individual case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0105JUD001310204
5 janvier 2010
Alternatively, they submitted that the applicant company had, at least in theory, domestic remedies as regards the complaint about the length of the tax dispute, but had failed to exhaust them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305JUD003627408
5 mars 2013
However, they did not submit the minutes from those hearings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD003223804
6 novembre 2012
Moreover, further aggravating factors included the high amounts mentioned in the documents and the fact that they had been linked with the professional capacities of the individuals mentioned in them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130JUD004720306
30 novembre 2010
The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, among other authorities
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0713JUD003803302
13 juillet 2006
They contested the amount to be paid and alleged that the street had not been duly constructed.