CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

20 025 résultats pour « Whalter »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142792

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2014

4 avril 2014

(v)     What activities involving the applicant were conducted by the Drug Control Service on 15   March 2006, and during what periods?

Source officielle

Page 13 sur 1002

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9057

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 1996

17 décembre 1996

(c)   What was at stake for applicant in proceedings Applicant's situation and what was at stake for him in proceedings had called for special expedition.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173702

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2017

28 avril 2017

    What was the obligation arising out of the administrative courts’ judgments in the present case?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12010

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2018

19 juillet 2018

During the inquiry, the domestic authorities had not made any serious attempts to find out what had happened.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-219406

Admin. suprême

30 août 2022

30 août 2022

  The parties are invited to discuss the following in their observations:   -   What is the purpose of limiting the ability of the intervenor to appeal in its own right or independently

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202141

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2020

2 mars 2020

Specifically, what is the position of the Prosecutor General’s Office, deciding on extraditions of persons wanted on terrorist charges, as to whether they belong to that group or the existence of the abovementioned

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245284

Admin. suprême

8 septembre 2025

8 septembre 2025

    What donations (in what amount and year) from the applicant’s brother residing abroad were rejected by the SAC: (a)     on the ground that the applicant had failed to prove the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178250

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2017

6 octobre 2017

    What were the requirements under domestic law which had to be met in order for the Weiden Regional Court to be authorised to take into account the further alleged offences of fraud when refusing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-618

Admin. suprême

10 février 2011

10 février 2011

Violations of Article   5 could be said to be recurrent in cases against Ukraine and raised the issue of what measures were required for Ukraine to comply with its legal obligation under Article &

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181738

Admin. suprême

23 février 2018

23 février 2018

    What were the grounds in the domestic law and/or practice allowing for the prosecutor’s participation in the present set of proceedings? 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-195063

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2019

11 juillet 2019

If yes, what evidence supports that? Did the applicant fail to comply with the police officers’ request to peacefully surrender to his arrest?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-162400

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2016

29 mars 2016

-     What was the legal basis for the applicant’s detention during the period in question?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-175535

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2017

20 juin 2017

  Also in this connection, what are the applicable domestic rules and regulations on the use of potentially lethal force by the security forces in similar illegal border crossing incidents?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216618

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2022

2 mars 2022

    What are the nature and the aim of the old age pension for long-term service (“ starosna mirovina za dugogodišnjeg osiguranika ”) under the domestic law?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216864

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2022

17 mars 2022

In particular, do the criteria and conditions for review laid down in domestic law have a sufficient degree of clarity and certainty, enabling the applicant to know, at the outset of his sentence, what

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-194108

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2019

29 mai 2019

(b)     Was the connection between the police informant and the police sufficiently examined in the proceedings; in particular, whether T.T.’s actions were imputable to the State and what his

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6859

Admin. suprême

9 juin 1998

9 juin 1998

of relevant provisions (Article 333 of Civil Code and Article 373 of Code of Civil Procedure) was rather general and national authorities had a wide measure of discretion, in particular to determine what

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10526

Admin. suprême

26 août 1994

26 août 1994

special compensation fund had not had effect of speeding up proceedings — slowness of Minister in submitting his reply and statement in defence; (ii)   administrative courts: crucial importance of what

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-151148

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2015

15 janvier 2015

Before the trial commenced, the jury were shown a video about their role as jurors, setting out what they should and should not do.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0510DEC001935402

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2005

10 mai 2005

  Q: What did you do when you heard them?   A: Standing at the corner ...   Q: Which one?   A: Number 9 side. ...   Q: What did you see?

Source officielle