On 18 July 2007, the applicant made a written submission containing an   interlocutory appeal against the decision of 10   July 2007.

The applicant lodged appeals against the interlocutory judgments; all the appeals were dismissed by final decisions of the Bucharest Court of Appeal. 3.

The applicant lodged an appeal against the decision at the Vrancea District Court, this time seeking a EUR 30,000 non-pecuniary damage award.

    No appeal lay against the above-mentioned decision. 11.     The applicant did not pay the fee. 12.

qu'elle détenait sur la SAS HOTEL LA BERRICHONNE pour un montant de 189 966 euros, a méconnu les dispositions de l'article L. 622-24 du code de commerce dès lors que le recours hiérarchique et d'interlocution

CET ENFANT EST AMELIORABLE ; "ALORS QUE L'EVALUATION DU PREJUDICE SUBBI PAR LA VICTIME D'UN ACCIDENT DOIT ETRE FAITE PAR LES TRIBUNAUX D'APRES L'ETAT DE LA VICTIME AU MOMENT OU ILS RENDENT LEUR DECISION

The brief and interlocutory nature of the appeal meant it would have been well-suited to being heard promptly in this way.

of 7 May 1985 and remitted the question of an interlocutory decision (decision of 9 November 1984) to the Ried Regional Court.

On 29 August 2001 the interlocutory-proceedings panel of the Maribor District Court dismissed the request on the grounds that the criminal proceedings had been discontinued in a decision that was final

The President of the Court certified the interlocutory decision on 18   September 1997 and a copy of it was served by the applicant on Apco on 1   October 1997.

On 27   December   1994, upon an appeal by M.E. ( pritožba ), the interlocutory-proceedings panel ( zunaj obravnavni senat ) of the Maribor Basic Court overturned the investigating judge’s decision

    The court held further that the interlocutory judgment of 24   September 2014 (see paragraph 11 above) was lawful and valid because the CC decision of June 2015 (see paragraph 42-44

Both applicants lodged an interlocutory appeal, arguing that no specific reasons had been given in the District Court’s decision to justify their pre ‑ trial detention.

On 28 May 2013 the applicant lodged an interlocutory appeal against this decision, arguing that the suspicion was ill-founded.

COUR D'APPEL DE MONTPELLIER 4e chambre civile ARRET DU 26 OCTOBRE 2022 Numéro d'inscription au répertoire général : N° RG 19/08246 - N° Portalis DBVK-V-B7D-OOJX ARRET N° Décision

The applicant lodged an interlocutory appeal. On 1 December 2006 the Rzeszów Court of Appeal ( Sąd Apelacyjny ) dismissed his interlocutory appeal.

In a decision that was served on the applicant on 18 September 2020, his interlocutory appeal was dismissed.

In particular, did the investigation in question satisfy the requirements set out in the interlocutory decision rendered in preliminary chamber by the Timișoara Court of Appeal on 14   May  

Par arrêt interlocutoire du 2 juin 1993, la cour d’appel déclara l’action contre l’Etat belge irrecevable et l’action contre la région flamande recevable.