He explained that the Bratislava III District Court, which had replaced the former Bratislava – vidiek District Court, had not yet dealt with the merits of his case.

District Courts of Kyiv). 18.

The case file was returned to the District Court on 21 July 1992. 15.

On 16 February 2010 the Koper District Court established that the conditions for extradition were met.

Stephen Phillips   Boštjan M. Zupančič Deputy Registrar   President   APPENDIX 1 (non-enforcement delays more than three years)   No.

    On 21 January 2010 the Neklinovskiy District Court in the Rostov Region dismissed the claim.

    Par un jugement du 26 octobre 2001, le tribunal de district rejeta cette action. Le requérant interjeta appel.

  Stephen Phillips   Boštjan M. Zupančič   Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX 1 (non-enforcement delays more than three years)   No.

Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 10   April   2012 as a committee composed of:   Mark Villiger, President,   Karel Jungwiert,   André Potocki, judges, and Stephen Phillips

Philippe YX..., 82°/ Mme Danièle YX..., née Jeffroy, demeurant ensemble ..., 83°/ M.

    On 18   August 1998 she lodged a claim with the Komsomolsky District Court of Kherson (“the District Court”) against the Komsomolsky District Hospital of Kherson seeking compensation

On 24 August 2012 the Yakkasaray District Court in Tashkent ordered his arrest. 6.

    On 27   May 2015 the District Court upheld the judgment of 2   September 2014 on appeal. The applicant and his lawyer were not present at the hearing.

On 19 December 2000 the Tachov District Court again allowed the action, holding that the conditions set forth in section 2(1)(c) of Law no.

    In February 1996 the applicant, who was later joined by a certain B., instituted proceedings in the Gagarinskyy District Court of Sevastopol (“the District Court”) against six individuals

    On 10 September 2003 the Kuybyshevskyy District Court (“the District Court”) delivered a judgment. The applicant appealed against it.

On 18 January 2007 the Znojmo District Court dismissed the applicant’s claim. Later, her appeal against this judgment was dismissed by the Brno Regional Court.

    Following the completion of the pre-trial investigation, on 19   December 1998 the case was referred to the Leninskyy District Court of Kirovograd (“the District Court”), which on 17

    The applicant brought an action before the Dresden District Court to have his paternity established.