They ended on 15 July 1997 with a judgment in which the Court of Cassation upheld the decision of the Court of Appeal, which had held that the applicants’ entitlement to compensation was time-barred.

The applicant’s lawyers, although summoned, did not attend the interrogation: The applicant’s first lawyer was not issued with a visa, however, he was informed that a visa might be issued once he had supplied

letter of 6 June 2019 the applicant’s representative was invited to submit by 18 July 2019 at the latest any written observations he might wish to make in reply on behalf of the applicant, together with

On 14 June 2001 the Kozmodemyansk Town Court of the Republic of Mari El ordered that the Kozmodemyansk Town Council provide the applicant with a flat.

The case was then adjourned in line with the Burdov   (no.   2) pilot judgment ( Burdov v.   Russia (no.   2) , no. 33509/04, ECHR 2009).

On 15 December 2004 the Kirovskiy District Court of Omsk ordered the Omsk Town Council to provide the applicant with a flat, to be granted on a priority basis.

At night and in the dark, the conduct of an economic activity in the border area is prohibited, except in cases of necessity, with the permission of the head of the frontier detachment and with the consent

Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Erik Josefsson, is a Swedish national who was born in 1936 and lives in Värnamo. He is represented before the Court by Ms   A.

Finally, the Court emphasises that, should the Government fail to comply with the terms of their unilateral declaration, the application may be restored to the list in accordance with Article   37

They further requested the Court to strike out the application in accordance with Article   37 of the Convention.

The monitoring of his written correspondence had been in accordance with Section 29 § 3 of the Execution of Sentences Act and the interception of his letters to his relatives in accordance with Section

The Constitutional Court held that the provision did not provide for an automatic and abstract criterion with no connection with the actual characteristics of the land and its market value.

    On 16 June 2016 the applicant withdrew his civil action stating that he had settled the dispute with the bank out of court and that the bank had complied with the claim in its entirety. 5

the Committee of Ministers once it had become final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention; Recalling that the case originated in an application (No. 36273/97) against the United Kingdom, lodged with

barreau de PARIS, vestiaire #J0073 Société ANCO [Adresse 5] [Localité 22] défaillante non constituée SMABTP Recherchée en sa qualité d’assureur de la société WEST INDIES INNOVATION TECHNOLOGIES (WIIT

SA, two entities entrusted with the management of the assets of the former regime and its high-ranking members.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article   39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

For these reasons, the Court, unanimously, Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.