On 11 November 2008 the Van public prosecutor filed a bill of indictment with the Van Assize Court, charging the applicant with disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK.

COMPLAINT The applicant originally complained about the non-enforcement of the decision in his favour.

The applicant company subsequently claimed compensation for inflation ‑ related losses and interests as a result of the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment given in its favour.

On 14 May 2007 the Adana Assize Court convicted the applicant of disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK under section 7(2) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law no. 3713).

X... et provenant des élevages d'Ars-les-Favets (Puy-de-Dôme) et Maillet (Allier), déclarés impropres à la consommation humaine, seraient retirés de la consommation après abattage ; 2°) annule pour excès

syndrome de Vacterl-Vater se traduisant par la coexistence de plusieurs malformations, consistant en une artère ombilicale unique, en un rein unique, en une malformation cardiaque, la tétralogie de Fallot

  1 concerning the non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicant's favour to the Government.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about delayed enforcement of the judgment in her late husband's favour.

The applicant did not inform the Court about the enforcement of the judgment in his favour and it was only from the Government's observations that the Court learned of it.

  1 ON ACCOUNT OF QUASHING OF THE JUDGMENT IN THE APPLICANT’S FAVOUR 14.

By a final judgment of 8 October 2003, the Supreme Court of Justice ruled in favour of ASITO and ordered the termination of the contract concluded in 1994.

The judgments in favour of the applicants have not been enforced to date. B.

On 3   May   2001, the Novogrodovsky City Court found in favour of the applicant ( Решение Новогродовского городского суда Донецкой области ).

THE LAW The applicant complained about the continued non-enforcement of the judgment delivered in his favour.

THE LAW The applicant complained about the continued non-enforcement of the judgment delivered in his favour.

THE LAW The applicant complained about the continued non-enforcement of the judgment delivered in his favour.

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that the authorities had failed to enforce the judgments in their favour. THE LAW A.

    The applicant complained that the quashing by way of supervisory review of the final judgments delivered in his favour had not been justified by circumstances of a substantial and compelling

This payment was effected by means of two Debit Advices of 6 December 2011 issued by the Ministry of Finance, Economy and Investment: one in favour of Dr Austin Bencini and another in favour of Dr Stefan

THE LAW The applicant complained about the continued non-enforcement of the judgment delivered in his favour.