Drinovec, a lawyer practising in Kranj. The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

They further informed Mr Stephens that the “TRNC” had rejected his claim.

[H] dépourvu de cause réelle et sérieuse ; Condamne la société LATTY INTERNATIONAL à payer à M.

his defence lawyer on 18   February   2004.

mandat donné par la SAS Lama France.

Margan, a lawyer practising in Rijeka. 2.     The Croatian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Š. Stažnik. A.     The circumstances of the case 3.

. 52602/17 Mikhail Andreevich CHUMAKOV against Hungary (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 29   August 2019 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie

SECTION DECISION Application no. 27689/19 Borys Yaroslavovych OSTAPYUK against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 6 October 2022 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie

no. 22137/16 HORTOBÁGYI LÚDTENYÉSZTŐ ZRT against Hungary (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 14   May 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphanie

Ogorilko , a lawyer practising in Chervonograd.

L'acte authentique a été passé en l'étude de la SCP ANTOMARCHI-LAME RICHARD LOISEAU-PRIEUR le 6 juillet 2009 moyennant le prix de 250.000 euros pour les murs et 15.000 euros pour le fonds de commerce.

Lipej, a lawyer practising in Medvode. Ms Minka Levart was represented before the Court by Ms   M.   Končan-Verstovšek, a lawyer practicing in Celje.

against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 11   July 2024 as a Committee composed of:   María Elósegui , President ,   Kateřina Šimáčková,   Stéphane

18413/24 Zsigmond LOSÓ against Hungary The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 27   February 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Gediminas Sagatys, President,   Stéphane

  Öztürk, lawyers practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 2.

No further appeal lay against this ruling. B.     Developments subsequent to the lodging of the application 6.

Končan Verstovšek, a lawyer practising in Celje. The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

Klakočar, a lawyer practising in Krško. The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

Končan Verstovšek, a lawyer practising in Celje. The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. The applicant was a party to two sets of proceedings.

Bromše, a lawyer practising in Celje. The Slovenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.