CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0616JUD000525602
16 juin 2009
Bosnie Herzégovine , n o 41183/02, § 53, CEDH 2006 ‑ XII, et Mehmet et Suna Yiğit c.
Page 14 sur 18
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0522DEC002992313
22 mai 2018
legislazione faccia sorgere un interesse patrimoniale che rientra nel campo di applicazione dell’articolo 1 del Protocollo n. 1 alla Convenzione in capo alle persone che soddisfano tali requisiti (Şerife Yiğit
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210662
25 mai 2021
Turkey 05/02/2019 Restriction of access to the investigation file Lack/Difficulties of legal assistance/other facilities Lack of reasonable suspicion 84 10066/19 Yiğit v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0908JUD003161516
8 septembre 2020
Bosnie-Herzégovine , n o 41183/02, § 53, CEDH 2006 ‑ XII, Mehmet et Suna Yiğit c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0905JUD005785415
5 septembre 2019
La protection du mariage constitue en principe une raison importante et légitime pouvant justifier une différence de traitement entre couples mariés et couples non mariés ( Şerife Yiğit c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0414JUD006900601
14 avril 2009
Bosnie Herzégovine , no 41183/02, § 53, CEDH 2006 ..., et Mehmet et Suna Yiğit c. Turquie , no 52658/99, § 47, 17 juillet 2007).
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1651350-1733881
21 avril 2006
Turkey (no. 23324/02) İbrahim Halil Yiğit v. Turkey (no. 23322/02) Özdemir and Others v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD000386904
27 octobre 2009
Turkey , no. 71795/01, § 50, 11 December 2007, Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v. Turkey , no. 52658/99, § 43, 17 July 2007, and Uzun v. Turkey , no.
ECLI:CEDH:001-237997
12 novembre 2024
Türkiye 23/08/2021 Kadir ALADAĞ 1991 Bursa Turkish Süleyman Enes YİĞİT 149. 42893/21 Türk v. Türkiye 18/08/2021 Erkan TÜRK 1985 Kahramanamaraş Turkish 150. 42999/21 Ekinci v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-234578
25 juin 2024
Türkiye 30/10/2020 Veysel ERDİNÇ 1980 Elazığ Turkish Ferhat YİĞİT 111. 50623/20 Akdoğan v. Türkiye 30/10/2020 Lokman AKDOĞAN 1982 Bingöl Turkish Mucahit NUSRETOĞLU 112. 50678/20 Koyuncu v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016DEC004188605
16 octobre 2018
14716/10 05/03/2010 Serbay YIĞİT 13/11/1983 SAMSUN Cavit ÇALIŞ When serving as a non-commissioned officer in the army in 2006, a criminal case was initiated against the applicant.
ECLI:CEDH:001-214415
23 novembre 2021
Turkey 29/03/2019 Length of pre-trial detention Lack of hearing during the detention review Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 111 19141/19 Yiğit v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1011JUD007863012
11 octobre 2022
42949/98 and 53134/99, 10 May 2007; and Şerife Yiğit v. Turkey [GC], no. 3976/05, 2 November 2010).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1216JUD005783719
16 décembre 2025
Türkiye 07/04/2020 Erkan DELİKTAŞ 1992 Istanbul Turkish Murat GÜRSOY 17973/20 Yiğit v. Türkiye 16/04/2020 Şener YİĞİT 1987 İzmir Turkish Umut YILMAZ 17995/20 Kaymaklı v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1112JUD003616718
Türkiye 12/04/2019 Yavuz KILIÇ 1986 Ankara Turkish Adem KAPLAN 27176/19 Yiğit v. Türkiye 03/05/2019 Songül YİĞİT 1974 Zonguldak Turkish Adem KAPLAN 27186/19 Yıldırım v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0613JUD006473212
13 juin 2019
Croatie [GC], n o 37685/10 et 22768/12, § 124, 20 mars 2018, et Şerife Yiğit c.Turquie [GC], n o 3976/05, § 52, CEDH 2010, et les références de jurisprudence citées).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0613JUD004142714
13 juin 2017
Bosnie-Herzégovine , n o 41183/02, § 53, CEDH 2006-XII, et Mehmet et Suna Yiğit c. Turquie , n o 52658/99, § 47, 17 juillet 2007).
ECLI:CEDH:001-210460
17 mai 2021
Turkey 26/01/2018 Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 21 8386/18 Yiğit v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614DEC004183110
14 juin 2016
Diyarbakır Saniye ZERİN 21/04/1974 Diyarbakır Yalçın DENİZ 01/01/1981 Diyarbakır Yalçın CÜRO 27/10/1975 Diyarbakır Abdurrazak ŞAHİN 22/01/1971 Diyarbakır Abdulmuttalip ORAL 01/01/1958 Diyarbakır Zülfiye YİĞİT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1121DEC005996321
21 novembre 2023
Relying on the Court’s case-law ( Schalk and Kopf , cited above; Şerife Yiğit v.