The parties had not been asked to attend.

Schneider had died one month prior to      the application being made and consequently the Secretary of      State was not satisfied that the marriage had not been

VILA AMIGÓ     Mrs   M. HION     MM   R. NICOLINI       A.

       The Commission has taken cognizance of both parties' submissions.

The police had received information that the applicant had had in his possession the leaflets which had been distributed in some towns in the municipality.

  He alleged that the persons who had carried out the removal had acted erroneously in that they had committed several procedural mistakes.

He also revoked the permission which the applicant had been given to consult his lawyers, communicate with other persons and receive visits in prison, in particular from his sister who had travelled from

  The Court found that it had not been sufficiently established whether at the time of the events there had been dense traffic in which case it would have been permitted to drive in a parallel line

He also asserted that he had never met N.Ö. before, nor had he known that he was a PKK member.

Heller had an interest in preventing the setting up of a law firm which had several offices and which could compete with his firm, and that he also had an interest in ensuring that there was a legal basis

The entitlement to an advance derived from an "obligation" which the state had voluntarily accepted.

The applicant argued that prior to 1979 she had had no other option than to rent the property under title of temporary emphyteusis, in order to avoid it being requisitioned as was common at the time.

M had been living in Sweden since 1989 by virtue of a permanent residence permit and had children of her own.

  The trial judge had refused to let the only evidence in the case - tape recorded conversations the applicant had had with an undercover woman police officer - be put to the jury, and had directed

VILA AMIGÓ            Mrs.   M. HION            Mr.    R.

VILA AMIGÓ            Mrs    M. HION            Mr     R.

On a date which has not been specified, his appeal was refused.

       The applicant states that he had always had difficulty in enforcing access, but that since November 1996 he has not seen his daughter at all, and that recently he has not

VILA AMIGÓ     Mrs   M. HION     MM   R. NICOLINI       A. ARABADJIEV   6.