It held that there was still a risk of the applicant absconding or interfering with the investigation, but that the aim of his detention in prison could be achieved with house arrest. 8 .

    The applicants were represented by Ms Diana-Elena Dragomir, a lawyer practising in Bucharest.

the observations submitted by the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicants, the decision of the Chamber to accept the applicants’ request for the recusal of Ms Diana

Serghides,   Gilberto Felici,   Andreas Zünd,   Diana Sârcu, judges ,   Anna Margaryan, ad hoc judge , and Victor Soloveytchik, Section Registrar , Having regard to: the application

By equating the ribbon to Nazi and communist symbols, the draft law aims to prevent war propaganda and incitement to hatred in Lithuania. 16.

Such an interference shall contravene Article 8 unless it is “in accordance with the law”, pursues one or more of the legitimate aims referred to in paragraph 2 thereof and furthermore is “necessary in

posed by Buk-TELAR to civilians travelling in civilian aircraft over eastern Ukraine Art 2 (procedural) • Downing of flight MH17 • Failure to conduct an effective investigation • Piecemeal inquiries with aim

(Fifth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Mattias Guyomar , President ,   María Elósegui,   Armen Harutyunyan,   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström,   Andreas Zünd,   Diana

the President of the Court decided that, in the interests of the proper administration of justice, this case should be referred to the Chamber constituted on 13 July 1995 to hear the case of Calogero Diana

Serghides,   Darian Pavli,   Peeter Roosma,   Ioannis Ktistakis,   Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir,   Diana Kovatcheva , judges , and Milan Blaško, Section Registrar, Having regard to:

Azerbaijan, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Ioannis Ktistakis , President ,   Lətif Hüseynov,   Darian Pavli,   Diana Kovatcheva

Chiriacova, Tamara Ciorba, Alina Condrat, Tatiana Costina, Olesea Frija, Natalia Ghetmacenco, Mihail Grozov, Maria Gudumac, Adriana Hristiniuc, Natalia Iacovenco, Ana Istratieva, Maria Lozinschi, Ana Lungu, Diana

11) against the Republic of Croatia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Croatian national, Ms Diana

sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Arnfinn Bårdsen , President ,   Egidijus Kūris,   Pauliine Koskelo,   Saadet Yüksel,   Lorraine Schembri Orland,   Frédéric Krenc,   Diana

Serghides,   Gilberto Felici,   Andreas Zünd,   Diana Sârcu,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges ,   Pavel Simon , ad hoc judge , and Victor Soloveytchik, Section Registrar, Having regard

Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Arnfinn Bårdsen , President ,   Egidijus Kūris,   Jovan Ilievski,   Saadet Yüksel,   Frédéric Krenc,   Diana

Regarding the length of his detention, the applicant argued that it had had no genuine connection to the purpose of deportation and had served no legitimate aim.

and to avoid perpetuation of discrimination resulting from their over-representation in one of the district’s school • Segregation in both schools not objectively and reasonably justified by legitimate aim

Existence of an interference (α)   General principles (β)   Application of those principles (ii)   Justification for the interference (α)   “Prescribed by law” (β)   Legitimate aim